Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / How the Bottom Fin of the FINESSE Fishbone Diagram Improves Big Decisions

by JD Solomon Leave a Comment

How the Bottom Fin of the FINESSE Fishbone Diagram Improves Big Decisions

How the Bottom Fin of the FINESSE Fishbone Diagram Improves Big Decisions

Communicating related to big decisions is a long game. Many presentations involving uncertainties and changing information will be made over months if not years. The FINESSE fishbone diagram provides the seven essential elements for effective communication for big decisions. Playing on the theme of a fish, a fish’s bottom fin provides it with stability. Let’s explore the bottom fin of the FINESSE fishbone diagram.

The Audience Comes Second

Unlike most communication training, which stresses the customer comes first, when it comes to big decisions, the data and information come first.

“Truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it.” – Flannery O’Connor.

Many presentations and reports are made throughout reaching a big decision. Those presentations and reports are made to a variety of the decision maker’s inner circle. Placating or sugarcoating the information to one group will ruin your credibility with the next group. Stay true to what the data and information are telling you.

It’s Not Your Decision to Make

A decision is an irrevocable allocation of resources. One person is usually responsible for that allocation, but an inner circle of advisors will be involved in big decisions.

“A decision is the irrevocable allocation of resources, while an intended course of action remains a plan until the decision is made.” – Ron Howard.

A simple rule is that you are an analyst or subject matter expert if you are making a presentation. You may also be a trusted advisor, but remember that trusted advisors usually provide verbal insights. In all cases, the decision maker is not making the presentation.

Deep Respect for the Decision Maker

Decision makers come is all shapes and sizes, with many levels of knowledge and experience. Regardless, the decision belongs to the decision maker, not you.

“Have endless respect for the decision maker. It may be a bit naive, but it is the right choice.” -Edward Tufte.

Many of us serve in decision making roles, whether it’s managing a department or a team. In those cases, we do not want our staff or our peers selectively providing data and information for decisions that are ours to make. The same can be said when we serve in a support role. Use the golden rule—treat others how you wish to be treated.

Bone 4: Empathy

Empathy is the ability to place someone in another person’s (or species’) mental or spiritual position. While the concept of “putting yourself in someone else’s shoes” is widely accepted, there are several challenges related to effectively communicating to decision makers on issues with high degrees of complexity and uncertainty.

“No one cares how much you know, until they know how much you care.”- President Theodore Roosevelt.

Is empathy a learned skill or a natural trait? It’s probably some of both, which means some people are naturally more effective communicators. In contrast, others have to work much harder at being effective communicators.

Empathy starts with understanding that it is all about the decision maker, not you.

Bone 5: Structure

Structure applies to written reports as well as verbal presentations. For multiple-event communication, there is a structure to the series of events and within each event. Each report and presentation within an event also requires a structure.

“Start at the end & work backward. This applies to writing emails, creating speeches, managing projects, planning events, or reaching goals.” — Dianna Booher.

Business professionals do not have the time to understand all the details of reports and presentations, so it is desirable to start with the conclusions.

Bone 6: Synergy

There is simply too much information for decision makers to process objectively on their own. Plus, social reinforcement is needed when dealing with what are frequently felt to be the most important decisions of the year (or career).

“There are compelling social reasons for group cooperation.” – Paul Shoemaker.

Group effects matter most when conveying technical information with high complexity and uncertainty.

What’s All of This Fin Stuff?

FINESSE is grounded in systems thinking and cause-and-effect relationships. The FINESSE fishbone diagram’s elements (or bones) are Frame, Illustrate, Noise, Empathy, Structure, Synergy, and Ethics.

While working on the visuals associated with the FINESSE fishbone diagram, we debated whether the skeleton should have fins or just bones. We chose the traditional depiction with just bones, but it created thought around the purpose of the fins.

The bottom fins of a fish, its pelvic fins, provide balance and stability, aid in precise movements like braking or hovering, and assist in minor directional control.

The second three bones of FINESSE are all about the audience. Like the bottom fin of a fish, the audience provides balance and stability for technically trained professionals communicating about big decisions.

FIN-ESSE

The seven bones of the FINESSE fishbone diagram are necessary and sufficient for effective communication for big decisions. Like any system, the performance of each bone does not have to be prefect as long as each is addressed and all work together.

The Fins of FINESSE provide some helpful associations. The bottom fin of FINESSE, the audience, provides us with our balance. Next, we’ll discuss the tail fin of FINESSE, ethics, which propel us forward.


Communicating with FINESSE is the not-for-profit community of technical professionals dedicated to being highly effective communicators and facilitators. Visit our Tackle Shop for communication and facilitation resources. Join the community for free.

Filed Under: Articles, Communicating with FINESSE, on Systems Thinking Tagged With: Big Decisions, Complexity, effective communication, FINESSE fishbone, Fishbone diagram, Uncertainty

About JD Solomon

JD Solomon, PE, CRE, CMRP provides facilitation, business case evaluation, root cause analysis, and risk management. His roles as a senior leader in two Fortune 500 companies, as a town manager, and as chairman of a state regulatory board provide him with a first-hand perspective of how senior decision-makers think. His technical expertise in systems engineering and risk & uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation provides him practical perspectives on the strengths and limitations of advanced technical approaches.  In practice, JD works with front-line staff and executive leaders to create workable solutions for facilities, infrastructure, and business processes.

« Six Sigma In 9 Minutes
New Series – The Quality of FMEAs »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of JD SolomonArticles by JD Solomon
in the Communicating with FINESSE article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy