Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / How Reliability Engineers Can Improve Their Communication in Information Sessions

by JD Solomon Leave a Comment

How Reliability Engineers Can Improve Their Communication in Information Sessions

How Reliability Engineers Can Improve Their Communication in Information Sessions

There was a lot to unpack from the 45-minute information session. After all, three different governmental units evaluated the issue for over three years. We had not had a debriefing on the issue in a year. And the issue was an emerging one, ripe with complexity and uncertainty. Effective communication can be difficult in these types of information sessions.


As a board member, I was also a little disappointed with the presentation by the staff. The presenter was a senior official who was normally very good at presenting complex, complicated information in a manner easily digestible to a broad audience. The 45-minute information session was an uninspiring B-. These are a few lessons learned.


Information Sessions Are Invitations to Wander

Technical professionals usually get three to five minutes to address decision makers. Milestone (an action or event marking a significant change or stage) information sessions are common with problems with high levels of complexity and uncertainty because resolution usually takes years. Milestone-type information sessions provide some freedom to roam for 20 to 30 minutes. However, wandering the entire time does not equate to a more effective presentation.


The Fundamentals of Structure Are Always Important

Milestone-type information sessions need a structure. The choice of a topical-based structure for the main body of the presentation is a good one. However, in this case, there was not enough attention paid to the Opening. The entire presentation suffered from early confusion on how everything tied together. More time does mean that the fundamentals of structure are less important.

I recently watched US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell provide a summary of two days of Federal Reserve Board meetings. I later analyzed it and published the findings. Powell presented two days of meetings, including all of the uncertainty and complexity of the US economy in 10 minutes and in less than 1500 concise words. Technical professionals can do that too, if we use a formal approach like FINESSE and have the proper Structure.


Provide Relevance to the Target Audience

Milestone-type information can wrongly take a research & development form where the message is ‘well, that’s the status of our activities and information to date.’ Wrong! You are presenting to decision makers because your work fits into their realm of resource allocation. Tell them how your work fits into the context of their future actions and what steps they can take in the interim to help you advise them in the future.

In most cases, a guiding graphic can be provided to show the overall progress of where the team has been and where it is going. The guiding graphic is more decorative than informational (think of it more as an atlas than as Google maps on your phone), but it does relieve the tendency that many presenters have to share too many process details that the decision makers have little interest.


Provide Your Information in Advance

In this case example, the information was properly provided in writing before the session. However, the advance information did not provide the key points and overarching linkages. This equated to one missed opportunity in the up-front material and another missed opportunity in the verbal presentation.

 

Applying It

The fundamentals of Communicating with FINESSE apply to information sessions. Good Structure, the fifth bone of FINESSE, is important in longer sessions. So is Empathy – after all, all decision makers have more than one thing on their plate. And the average attention span of civilized humans is down from 12 seconds to 8 seconds.

You have no more than 15 minutes to make your points in an information session, despite whether you are allowed 30, 45, or even 60 minutes. Strive for effective communication regardless of the session format.


Founded by JD Solomon, Communicating with FINESSE is the community of technical professionals dedicated to more effective communication of decisions with high levels of complexity and uncertainty. Learn more about our publications, webinars, and workshops. Join the community for free.

Filed Under: Articles, Communicating with FINESSE, on Systems Thinking

About JD Solomon

JD Solomon, PE, CRE, CMRP provides facilitation, business case evaluation, root cause analysis, and risk management. His roles as a senior leader in two Fortune 500 companies, as a town manager, and as chairman of a state regulatory board provide him with a first-hand perspective of how senior decision-makers think. His technical expertise in systems engineering and risk & uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation provides him practical perspectives on the strengths and limitations of advanced technical approaches.  In practice, JD works with front-line staff and executive leaders to create workable solutions for facilities, infrastructure, and business processes.

« FMEA Detection Risk: Insights and Advices
History Repeats Itself: Buncefield, Puerto Rico, Jaipur »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of JD SolomonArticles by JD Solomon
in the Communicating with FINESSE article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Leadership Values in Maintenance and Operations
  • Today’s Gremlin – It’ll never work here
  • How a Mission Statement Drives Behavioral Change in Organizations
  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy