Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / How Many Steps Are Needed in SOPs and Standard Instructions?

by JD Solomon Leave a Comment

How Many Steps Are Needed in SOPs and Standard Instructions?

How Many Steps Are Needed in SOPs and Standard Instructions?

Project managers are challenged by creating, implementing, and maintaining workflows, Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), and standard instructions. The same applies to maintenance and reliability professionals who develop preventative maintenance (PMs) and job plans. Knowing the difference between each type is the first step. Then, the number of steps in each of these often depends on the audience’s experience, the task’s complexity, and preference. It’s most important for project managers to find the sweet spot. 

Project Management and the Most Common Workflows

This is my Top 12 list of the most common workflows accompanying any project.

1.      Request For Information

2.      Change Order

3.      Monthly Status Report

4.      Consultant Invoice Approval

5.      Pay Application Approval

6.      Set Work Breakdown Structure

7.      Permits

8.      Amendment Review and Approval

9.      Budget Change Approval

10. Commitment Approval

11. Design Review – One Lane

12. Field Inspection/Daily Reports 

Processes, Procedures, and Standard Instructions

Process

A process is a series of actions or operations conducing to an end [Merriman-Websters]. Think of a process as everything needed, expressed or implied, to produce an outcome.

Procedures

A procedure, or Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), is a series of steps followed in a regular definite order [Merriman-Websters]. Although procedures rarely capture every aspect of a process, they usually include all of the binding pieces needed for accountability. 

Instructions, Guidelines, and Checklists vs. SOPs and Processes

Instructions

Instructions are detailed directions on how to do a specific task or action. Instructions may be part of an SOP, but they are typically shorter. 

Guidelines

Guidelines are recommendations or best practices for carrying out an activity or task. They provide general advice but don’t go into specific steps or rigid instructions. 

For example, a guideline for managing team meetings might recommend “Include time for team member feedback” but not mandate a specific structure, exact timing, or place in the meeting sequence. 

Checklists

A checklist is a list of items or actions that need to be completed to ensure that a process or procedure is conducted correctly. It is a tool for confirming that tasks are not forgotten, but it does not necessarily explain how each task should be performed. 

For example, a checklist for equipment maintenance might list “Check oil level,” “Inspect cables,” and “Test functionality.”

 

The Instructions, Guidelines, and Checklists for this short essay are the same (less specific than procedures and processes). 

Procedure (SOP) vs. Process

A procedure (or Standard Operating Procedure) is a detailed, step-by-step guide for conducting a specific task or activity. It outlines the exact steps, responsibilities, tools, and materials required to complete a task and is often standardized to ensure consistency, quality, and compliance with regulations. SOPs are typically prescriptive, formalized, and legally binding.

 A process is a high-level series of steps or activities that need to be followed to achieve a specific outcome. It’s more focused on the flow of work and the sequence of events (hence, the term Workflows, Work Processes, or Business Process Mapping). However, a process may not provide the detailed “how” to perform each step.

 A process is more flexible and less prescriptive than an SOP. 

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

The good, the bad, and the ugly of workflow depend on where you sit, which includes your industry and your specific organizational context.  

Most people and organizations don’t have well-developed workflows; even if they were once well-developed, they are not well-maintained. 

One of the first things we do when failures or near misses occur is map the workflows associated with the event. That makes business process mapping one of the three essential tools for any Root Cause Analysis. 

Written Work Processes In Practice

Most people and organizations prefer fewer formal steps. Here’s a breakdown: 

Experienced Staff: 8 to 12 Steps

  • Why? Experienced professionals benefit from concise instructions that focus on key actions or decisions. They often rely on their expertise to fill in the nuances or contexts that aren’t explicitly detailed.
  • When to Use? High-level workflows for tasks where staff already have a solid foundation and familiarity with the process.
  • Challenges: Over-simplification leads to missed nuances if critical steps are skipped.

Experienced personnel, experienced managers, and project managers from general manufacturing or traditional construction companies tend to prefer fewer documented steps. 

Inexperienced Staff: 28 to 34 Steps

  • Why? Novices require more detailed, granular instructions to avoid missing any important steps. This includes explicitly stating things that experienced professionals might find intuitive.
  • When to Use? Training materials, onboarding documents, or tasks where precision and consistency are critical.
  • Challenges: Detailed instructions can be overwhelming if not organized well, leading to a risk of information overload.

Outside consultants tend to push organizations in this direction. So do project managers from high-reliability organizations or sectors like surgical centers, pharmaceutical manufacturing, aviation, and nuclear power tend to want detailed steps. 

The Troublesome Middle

The troublesome middle is the 12- to 18-step work processes that work best in practice. However, neither extreme is completely happy, so a see-saw battle usually ensues when the workflows are reviewed and updated.

Quite frankly, no one is ever really happy when workflows are reviewed or updated because of the transitions that occur between those who approved them in the first place. 

Balancing the Step Count

  • Chunking: Break down long processes into manageable sections (phases or sub-tasks). For example, instead of one SOP with 30 steps, create three sections with ten steps each.
  • Formats: Use flowcharts, diagrams, or bullet points to make the document more digestible.
  • Customization: Start with the detailed version and develop a condensed “quick guide” for experienced users and refresher training.
  • Updates: As staff gain proficiency, evolve detailed SOPs to summaries or decision trees. 

Practical Guideline

When creating instructions, assess:

  1. Audience Skill Level: How much prior knowledge or expertise do they have?
  2. Task Complexity: Does the task involve multiple systems, tools, or decision points?
  3. Risk of Errors: How critical is following each step exactly as written?

A mix of detailed and high-level guides might ultimately serve your organization best, ensuring flexibility for varying levels of expertise. 

How Many Steps Are Needed for Standard Instructions

Yep, from the subtitle, you can tell I prefer shorter standard instructions and SOPs. With that said, I really prefer standard instructions to standard operating procedures. Start simple and build complexity over time. Minimize what you must maintain. Above all, hire and retain project managers who know what they are doing. Competence overcomes many shortfalls in the process.


JD Solomon served in executive leadership roles at two Fortune 500 companies before starting JD Solomon, Inc., just before the pandemic. JD is the founder of Communicating with FINESSE®, the creator of the FINESSE fishbone diagram®, and the co-creator of the SOAP criticality method©.

Filed Under: Articles, Communicating with FINESSE, on Systems Thinking Tagged With: Checklists, Processes, Project Management, SOP, Standard Instructions, workflow

About JD Solomon

JD Solomon, PE, CRE, CMRP provides facilitation, business case evaluation, root cause analysis, and risk management. His roles as a senior leader in two Fortune 500 companies, as a town manager, and as chairman of a state regulatory board provide him with a first-hand perspective of how senior decision-makers think. His technical expertise in systems engineering and risk & uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation provides him practical perspectives on the strengths and limitations of advanced technical approaches.  In practice, JD works with front-line staff and executive leaders to create workable solutions for facilities, infrastructure, and business processes.

« ALT or Durability Test?
The Army Memo to Stop Using Mil HDBK 217 »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of JD SolomonArticles by JD Solomon
in the Communicating with FINESSE article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy