Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / How Building Better Business Cases Improves Reliability

by JD Solomon Leave a Comment

How Building Better Business Cases Improves Reliability

A Business Case Evaluation (BCE) is a decision-making tool that assists in making value-based funding decisions. Business cases are developed in the early capital and operating budget planning cycles as a standardized and systematic process to analyze the benefits and costs of various options to solve an identified problem or a cost-saving/revenue-generating idea. A big part of building better business cases is analyzing the system over the long term for monetary and non-monetary aspects. Building better business cases improves reliability and performance by formally documenting “needs” versus “wants.” Business cases serve as a powerful communication tool at all levels of an organization.

Examples: Actuators Gone Bad

A company has many actuated valves and decides to standardize on a certain brand (“Brand X”). Within two years of the warranty period ending, a trend of sudden critical failures is experienced. Most of the valves are 8 to 24 inches and fail during normal operations. The company believes the failures relate to the actuator primary circuit board (PCB). The maintenance staff cannot keep up with the current workload and cannot address the unanticipated failures of the actuators.

The situation is identified for a formal business case. The identified options are:

1. Status quo: Maintain existing practices and address issues when/if they occur.

2. Contract with the manufacturer (or an associated vendor) to address failures as they occur.

3. Increase the level of internal resources to address failures proactively.

4. Elimination of “Brand X” actuators and replacement with another brand

Without the formal business case, status quo was a popular option because it produced fewer conflicts and questions up the line. Replacing all of the “Brand X” actuators was also popular, especially for staff who were not there when the standardization decision was made.

The business case format, the financial numbers’ documentation, and the team collaboration generated a decision to go with Option 2. However, with the stigma of a bad decision now removed, the company aggressively pursued talks with the manufacturer about replacing the primary circuit boards for free. The manufacturer agreed. The problem was resolved with new primary circuit boards and the company remains satisfied with system performance several years later.

Value-Focused vs. Alternatives-Focused

A BCE differs from studying various alternatives to the same solution, such as performed in a Preliminary Engineering Report (PER). BCEs are value-based, meaning that they are performed when an idea is generated and consider the full range of the organization’s values to determine an intended direction of action. PERs are alternatives-based, meaning they are performed after an intended course of action is determined.

 

“With alternatives-focused thinking, you first figure out what alternatives are available and then choose the best of the lot. With value-focused thinking, you end up getting much closer to getting all of what you want.”

— Ralph Keeney

One example is the decision to travel from one city to another. A BCE is used to determine which mode of travel should be taken (e.g., car, bus, plane, train). Once the mode of travel is selected, a study of alternatives would determine which route to take.

A central component of a BCE is the inclusion of non-monetized values. An example is the Triple Bottom Line (TBL), which includes financial considerations, social impacts, and environmental benefits.

https://www.jdsolomonsolutions.com/post/ask-the-experts-replay-building-better-business-cases

Relative Costs

One of the most valuable aspects of a value-based BCE is that relative costs can be used. In the travel example, knowing the exact cost of a plane ticket versus a bus ticket versus a car’s mileage is unnecessary because the relative costs are more important in the planning phase. The actual costs only matter when choosing between alternatives between different airline carriers. Focusing on the values-based decision saves time and avoids internal “analysis paralysis” when too many variations are available.

Example: Building a New Facility

A public water and sewer system had a difficult decision to make. For nearly a decade, it had been providing wholesale wastewater treatment services to a small special-purpose district that had decided not to expand its treatment plant. The smaller system unexpectedly requested that the larger system take over the operations and infrastructure.

A formal business case was used to evaluate the decisions. The options included:

1, Status Quo – taking over an aged system may impact reliability and service levels

2, Agree to operate but not own the system

3. Operate and own the current system

4. Acquire the system and convert the small plant into a pumping station

Each option was divided into 10 to 12 cost and revenue line items. Order-of-magnitude costs (i.e., cost per gallon, cost per foot, etc.) were initially used. After reviewing the initial financial estimates, it was clear that Option 4 was preferable if the utility was politically directed to participate with the smaller system.

Tiered Approach

Tiered (or scalable) approaches are desirable by most organizations. Smaller investment decisions may not require a simple financial analysis and subjective non-monetized evaluation. One example may be to replace a piece of laboratory equipment with a similar one or to upgrade to a higher technology device with built-in analytics. Another example may include the evaluation of in-sourcing or out-sourcing routine maintenance activities. A lower-tier BCE may be prepared with a standard format in an email.

 

“A BCE gets you what you need. That may be a little different than what you thought in the beginning, but the process helps you get to the right place.”

— Capital Program Manager.

Larger investment ideas require a more detailed financial evaluation (capital costs, operating costs, salvage value, time value of money, etc.) and a more structured approach to the non-monetized assessment (such as multi-criteria analysis with a group). The BCE would follow the same standard format, but the higher-tier BCE would include two to four pages of text plus attachments.

Standard Process

Step 1 — Define the Problem or Opportunity

Step 2 — Executive Sponsor Assigns BCE Lead and Support Team

Step 3 — Hold BCE Kick-off Meeting

Step 4 — Develop a Problem Statement

Step 5 — Formalize the Description of the Options

Step 6 — Confirm BCE Problem Statement and Options with Executive Sponsor

Step 7 — Complete BCE Analysis and Documentation

Step 8 — Presentation to Executive Sponsor

Why Some People Avoid Business Cases

The Top 5 reasons provided are not necessarily good reasons, at least in theory, but are the real reasons based on three decades in the business. The reasons just are. The good news is that existing business case formats are “out there” and can be adapted to your organization. All you need to be willing to do is avoid the status quo (and frustration) of informal capital and O&M decision processes. 

https://www.jdsolomonsolutions.com/post/observed-in-practice-5-reasons-for-not-doing-written-business-cases

Improving Reliability with Business Cases

A big part of building better business cases is analyzing systems over the long term for monetary and non-monetary aspects. Building better business cases improves reliability and performance by formally documenting “needs” versus “wants.” A well-executed business case brings cross-functional departments and their leaders together. Business cases serves has powerful communication tools for all levels of an organization.


Communicating with FINESSE is a not-for-profit community of technical professionals dedicated to being highly effective communicators and facilitators. Learn more about our publications, webinars, and workshops. Join the community for free.

JD Solomon is the author of Communicating Reliability, Risk & Resiliency to Decision Makers: How to Get Your Boss’s Boss to Understand and Facilitating with FINESSE: A Guide to Successful Business Solutions.

JD Solomon Inc provides solutions for facilitation, asset management, and program development at the nexus of facilities, infrastructure, and the environment. 

Filed Under: Articles, Communicating with FINESSE, on Systems Thinking, Uncategorized Tagged With: Business Cases, communication, Decision making

About JD Solomon

JD Solomon, PE, CRE, CMRP provides facilitation, business case evaluation, root cause analysis, and risk management. His roles as a senior leader in two Fortune 500 companies, as a town manager, and as chairman of a state regulatory board provide him with a first-hand perspective of how senior decision-makers think. His technical expertise in systems engineering and risk & uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation provides him practical perspectives on the strengths and limitations of advanced technical approaches.  In practice, JD works with front-line staff and executive leaders to create workable solutions for facilities, infrastructure, and business processes.

« What is Reliability Centered Maintenance?
Only People who are Biased Think they are Not Biased »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of JD SolomonArticles by JD Solomon
in the Communicating with FINESSE article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy