Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Give a Little to Get More

by Tim Rodgers 1 Comment

Give a Little to Get More

Give a Little to Get More

I’ve been managing supplier relationships for almost my entire career, including hardware component suppliers, contract manufacturers, technology alliance partners, and engineering service providers.

Over that time I’ve worked with a number of people at all levels who seem to believe that their one-up position as the customer entitles them to demand more from suppliers while paying less.

The attitude seems to be: “Do as I say or we’ll take our business elsewhere.”

I think this is very short-sighted, particularly if switching costs are significant.

 

“Negotiation 101”

People often underestimate the time and effort required to establish a relationship with a new supplier and achieve the minimum level of performance that’s required to meet business objectives.

Changing suppliers is a very big step, and that step should not be taken as an emotional reaction. Furthermore, “Negotiation 101” teaches that you don’t make threats that you’re not truly willing to execute.

If you’ve really reached the breaking point in a supplier relationship, you must be sure to have a transition plan and backup suppliers.

I believe that suppliers who are squeezed on price will give you the minimum performance necessary to maintain the relationship. They may even decide to drop you as a customer, depending on the power balance between buyers and sellers in that particular market.

Whether in a one-time transaction or an ongoing relationship, the elements that are exchanged between customer and supplier are multi-dimensional: on-time delivery, assurance of supply (and demand), quality, return policies, technology transfer, intellectual property, licensing, warranties, and strategic plans.

“Lowest price” is typically not the most important consideration when choosing a supplier in the first place.

 

Understand your supplier’s needs

I’ll go further and suggest that leaving some money on the table — or compromising in other non-price dimensions — gives a supplier a reason to go above and beyond.

You can’t specify every aspect of the transaction in Terms & Conditions, and how a supplier deals with those ambiguities depends on how much they value the relationship. I’m not saying that the customer should yield on every contentious issue.

I am saying that suppliers have their own needs, and understanding those needs enables a smart customer to maximize the benefits for both sides.

I’ll go further still and say that the same thing applies to the relationship between a company and their employees.

People who are working only “for the money” are not inspired, give only the minimum, and won’t fully contribute their talents.


Related:

Supplier Management Fundamentals (article)

Additional Reliability Specification for Your Supplier (article)

What to Specify with Suppliers to Achieve Reliability Goals (article)

 

Filed Under: Articles, Managing in the 2000s, on Leadership & Career

About Tim Rodgers

I'm a director-level global operations manager experienced in leading hardware engineering and new product development teams, project & program management (PMP certification), quality engineering (Six Sigma Black Belt), and international manufacturing and supply chain management for consumer electronics and industrial markets.

I graduated from the University of California (Santa Cruz) with a Ph.D. in chemistry, and later received an MBA from the University of Oregon. I've been employed by large aerospace and consumer electronics companies, and spent two years in China while working for the world's largest contract manufacturer. I'm currently teaching supply chain management and operations management at the University of Colorado (Boulder) and Colorado State University.

« Basic Care Leads to Reliability
Don’t Run Centrifugal Pumps on the End of the Curve »

Comments

  1. Michael Joe Vella says

    June 29, 2024 at 7:27 PM

    Tim; your thoughts on exploiting a customer/supplier relationship is right on. Changing suppliers is a risky business. It may be required if quality or delivery is poor over the long term, or if there are basic integrity gaps in the relationship. A on-going positive and profitable relationship is vital to long term viability.

    Keep up the good work.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Tim Rodgers

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy