Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / FMEA Recommended Actions – Insights and Advices

by Carl S. Carlson Leave a Comment

FMEA Recommended Actions – Insights and Advices

FMEA Recommended Actions – Insights and Advices

Did you know that early FMEA standards did not include recommendations to reduce risk? They limited the analysis to the technical risk, without making specific recommendations. The first time I am aware of that an FMEA standard added a column called “Recommended Actions” was in 1993. Thankfully, it is common practice today to include Recommended Actions in FMEAs.

But what makes for excellent Recommended Actions and what is their role in an FMEA? We’ll begin with the fundamentals.

What are FMEA Recommended Actions?

By definition, in an FMEA, Recommended Actions are the tasks recommended by the FMEA team that can be performed to reduce or eliminate the risk associated with potential cause of failure.

I’ve written two articles on the subject of FMEA Recommended Actions that are part of the FMEA Fundamentals Series. Any review should begin by reading these articles.

“Understanding FMEA Recommended Actions: Actions Speak Louder than Words”

“Understanding FMEA Recommended Actions: Problems and Solutions”

Why do FMEAs need to identify recommendations?

The short answer is the risk associated with the identified failure modes, effect and causes must be reduced to an acceptable level. That is what effective FMEAs should do.

What are qualities of excellent Recommended Actions?

There are at least three:

1. In most cases, when risk is high for a given failure mode and cause, multiple recommendations are needed: one to reduce the Severity risk, if possible; at least one to reduce the Occurrence risk, and possibly one to reduce risk associate with Detection.

Here are three articles on reducing Severity, Occurrence and Detection risk:

“Action Strategies to Reduce Severity Risk”

“Action Strategies to Reduce Occurrence Risk”

“Action Strategies to Reduce Detection Risk”

2. Recommended Actions need to be clear and specific. Examples are included in the above article, “Understanding FMEA Recommended Actions.”

3. Recommended Actions need to fix the cause and reduce the risk associated with the failure mode, effect and cause to an acceptable level. This is essential.

What are common mistakes when identifying Recommended Actions?

1. The most common mistake is to believe that because there is an entry in the Recommended Actions column, somehow that fulfills the requirement. FMEA is not an exercise in filling out a form. It is a team exercise that analyzes designs or processes, identifies risk, and takes positive action to reduce risk.

2. Another common mistake is to believe that a single action will adequately reduce risk. As covered above, multiple actions are usually needed to reduce high risk.

3. Some FMEA teams miss the opportunity to reduce Severity, Occurrence and Detection risk, all three.

Summary

Effective FMEAs use multiple well thought-out recommendations to reduce Severity, Occurrence and Detection risk to acceptable levels for all higher risk issues. This is a goal worth achieving.

Next Article

The next article take up the subject of Quantitative Criticality Analysis that is used in MIL-STD 1629A. I’ll share when and why it is used, and answer the question if this technique can be used in commercial applications?

[display_form id=415]

Filed Under: Articles, Inside FMEA, on Tools & Techniques Tagged With: Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)

About Carl S. Carlson

Carl S. Carlson is a consultant and instructor in the areas of FMEA, reliability program planning and other reliability engineering disciplines, supporting over one hundred clients from a wide cross-section of industries. He has 35 years of experience in reliability testing, engineering, and management positions, including senior consultant with ReliaSoft Corporation, and senior manager for the Advanced Reliability Group at General Motors.

« Self Ownership Part 1
15 Ways to Remove Operational Risk »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Carl Carlson
in the Inside FMEA series

[popup type="" link_text="Logo Info" ]

Information about FMEA Icon

Inside FMEA can be visually represented by a large tree, with roots, a solid trunk, branches, and leaves.

- The roots of the tree represent the philosophy and guiding principles for effective FMEAs.
- The solid trunk of the tree represents the fundamentals for all FMEAs.
- The branches represent the various FMEA applications.
- The leaves represent the valuable outcomes of FMEAs.
- This is intended to convey that each of the various FMEA applications have the same fundamentals and philosophical roots.

 

For example, the roots of the tree can represent following philosophy and guiding principles for effective FMEAs, such as:

1. Correct procedure         2. Lessons learned
3. Trained team                 4. Focus on prevention
5. Integrated with DFR    6. Skilled facilitation
7. Management support

The tree trunk represents the fundamentals of FMEA. All types of FMEA share common fundamentals, and these are essential to successful FMEA applications.

The tree branches can include the different types of FMEAs, including:

1. System FMEA         2. Design FMEA
3. Process FMEA        4. DRBFM
5. Hazard Analysis     6. RCM or Maintenance FMEA
7. Software FMEA      8. Other types of FMEA

The leaves of the tree branches represent individual FMEA projects, with a wide variety of FMEA scopes and results. [/popup]

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy