Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Failure Analysis of a Gearbox, Fan, Bearing and Shaft

by Mike Sondalini 2 Comments

Failure Analysis of a Gearbox, Fan, Bearing and Shaft

Failure Analysis of a Gearbox, Fan, Bearing and Shaft

Failure Analysis of a Gearbox, Fan, Bearing and Shaft

When equipment breaks unexpectedly it is good practice to investigate why it happened so that the root cause can be rectified and the problem prevented from again happening.

There are no mysterious causes, only poor systems or system failures. It is not often that people intentionally sabotage plant and equipment.

By analyzing why a thing happened the lesson can be absorbed and changes made to business systems to reduce its probability of reoccurrence.

In this article, four equipment failures are reviewed and investigated to determine their cause and the resulting necessary changes.

Keywords: root cause failure analysis, failure mode.

We missed the gearbox oil leak and the motor burnt out.

On New Year’s Eve, the drive motor on a critical bucket elevator burnt out after 20 years of operation.

Oil from the gearbox had leaked onto the windings. The oil-covered windings could no longer be cooled by the forced air draft from the fan. The motor cooked.

I don’t know how, but 4 of the maintenance crew came in to fix it. We had no spare.

Unbelievably, and to their great credit, our supplier came in too, took a look at the drive, opened up his warehouse for us and dropped off a new drive.

Just short of midnight the bucket elevator was going again.

An impressive effort by all concerned. But what happened to cause the failure?

It turned out that the gearbox was not on a preventative maintenance inspection round.

It had been but was taken off the list, as there was a three weekly lubrication round to grease the head pulley shaft bearings beside the gearbox. The greasing was diligently done, but the oil leaking over the motor from the gearbox was missed.

Everyone thought that the person during the greasing round would look about and note any obvious problems.

To be fair about the situation you should know that someone had in the past wrapped Denso tape around the leaking gearbox flange to try keeping the oil in the box. But that’s where it had stopped.

They may even have reported the leak, but it never actually got fixed.

Everything fell apart on New Year’s Eve.

Are your people walking around with blinkers on? What are they missing that they should be seeing?

When your people report a future problem what happens to ensure it gets fixed?

In this case, the gearbox and motor went back onto a 3 monthly inspection round with a comment on the checklist specifically asking if oil was leaking.

The other gearboxes throughout the site had the same inspection added to their checklists. And the tradesmen were asked to not only report a problem but to raise a work order request to get it fixed.

Which way are your centrifugal fans spinning? 

A fan was run in reverse and when the direction was changed the motor overloaded.

People make the mistake of thinking that when a fan goes backwards it will suck and not blow. This is true for axial flow fans but not for centrifugal fans.

Centrifugal fans, like centrifugal pumps, will force product out no matter which way they turn.

If they are running backwards you will still feel a draft but the flow is very much less than it should be.

When centrifugal fans are commissioned take the gas stream velocity readings and calculate the flow from the formula:

Flow (in m3/sec) = Velocity (m/sec) x duct area (m2)

Then check the flow for the fan against the design value to be sure the motor is wired in properly.

If you think the 3 phase motor will handle it you could reverse two of the wires and measure the air velocity for each direction.

Before setting the motor overload protection check that the fan is running in the right direction.

Bearing temperature rocketed, but there was nothing wrong

The operator rushed into the maintenance shop saying that the hammermill bearing was running hot with boiling grease spitting out of the bearing housing shaft seals.

Damn, not again – the bearing was replaced just 4 weeks ago.

Sure enough, you couldn’t put your hand on the bearing. My spit didn’t boiler, so about 85 – 90C. (It turned out to be 95C using the temperature gun.)

The grease was black from being cooked.

One of the guys got the FAG hand-held bearing vibration monitor and checked the bearing.

The vibration readings were fine; there was nothing wrong. But what had made it run so hot?

It was the drive end bearing and it was under a big load from the four vee-belts running off the 45kW 4-pole motor. But that had always been the case and the bearing did not have a history of failing.

The only thing that wasn’t changed last time was the bearing housing; maybe the outer bearing race was spinning in the housing?

It was late in the day and we had to do something!

So it was decided to change out both the bearing and housing for new. The top half of the housing was lifted off.

No burn marks on the outer race! So the bearing wasn’t spinning in the housing.

Then the Mechanical Maintenance Planner said he would check the recommended bearing grease viscosity from a nomogram in the SKF general bearing catalog to see if we were using grease that was too thick.

Turns out he was ‘right on the money’.

We were using grease with 4 times the recommended viscosity at the operating temperature than what should have been in use.

We didn’t have to replace the bearing after all; we just needed to get the right grease for the application.

What a complete waste of time and effort in replacing a perfectly good bearing and housing!

If you find your bearings running unexpectedly hot then be sure to check if the grease is of the right viscosity for the normal operating temperature.

If it is too thick it will cause friction as the rolling elements push their way through it.

If it is too thin the temperature will rise from the metal-to- metal contact between the rolling element and the raceways.

Snapping shafts tell a story of deflection

The screw conveyor (auger) shaft was broken in half right at the center. It was a 3200 mm long, 50 mm (2”) diameter, Schedule 40, 316 stainless steel pipe with the 1:1 pitch screw flights stitch-welded to it.

The break was dead in the middle between the two end-supporting roller bearings.

An identical break had happened only 2 months previously.

What was causing the brand new shaft to break?

A close examination of the screw conveyor trough told the story.

The product had built up 10 – 15 mm thick on the bottom of the trough.

It was caked on and would only come off when hit with the blade end of a pinch bar.

When the screw had been in place in the trough, it was forced to ride over the thick crust, while the two ends were held tight in the bearings. The crust produced a deflection in the shaft.

The biggest deflection was at the center of the screw where it caused the greatest bending stress.

As the screw turned during operation, the highest cycling stress was in the middle at the point of maximum deflection.

The stress in the bar changed from tension to compression during each turn of the shaft – exactly like you bending a paper clip up and down until it breaks.

The shaft failed for the same reason – metal fatigue due to cycling stresses caused by the crust build-up bending the shaft.

If you have screw conveyors in use on a crust-building product, make sure the crust on the bottom of the trough is regularly cleaned out.

Otherwise be ready to change out the shaft. If you are experiencing any shaft breakage at the mid-point between end supports, check to see if the shaft is experiencing excessive deflection under cyclic or fluctuating loads. (You will soon get a fully comprehensive article in the UP-TIME monthly flyer on the analysis of this failure along with complete coverage of the development of bending stresses in beams supported at both ends.)

Mike Sondalini – Equipment Longevity Engineer

[ninja_form id=431]

If you found this interesting, you may like the ebook Centrifugal Pump Problems & Answers.

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, Plant Maintenance Tagged With: Failure analysis (FA)

About Mike Sondalini

In engineering and maintenance since 1974, Mike’s career extends across original equipment manufacturing, beverage processing and packaging, steel fabrication, chemical processing and manufacturing, quality management, project management, enterprise asset management, plant and equipment maintenance, and maintenance training. His specialty is helping companies build highly effective operational risk management processes, develop enterprise asset management systems for ultra-high reliable assets, and instil the precision maintenance skills needed for world class equipment reliability.

« Beware the Walls May Be Listening and the Appliances Are Loose
The Top 10 Signs That You Have a World Class Reliability & Maintenance Program (Part 1) »

Comments

  1. Tarun Khatri says

    January 17, 2017 at 11:51 AM

    Excellent case study presented in the article. The ‘heating of the bearing’ case scenario presents the fact that how shall we drive towards the conclusion at a minimum amount of time; thereby presenting a snapshot of a RCA analysis. Thank you Fred!

    Cheers,
    Tarun Khatri

    Reply
  2. I. Ashukri says

    February 14, 2021 at 8:55 AM

    Excellent, historical gearbox story
    Thank you..

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by
Mike Sondalini
in the
Plant Maintenance series.

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Today’s Gremlin – It’ll never work here
  • How a Mission Statement Drives Behavioral Change in Organizations
  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy