Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Facilitation Skill #3: Asking Probing Questions

by Carl S. Carlson Leave a Comment

Facilitation Skill #3: Asking Probing Questions

Facilitation Skill #3: Asking Probing Questions

FMEA facilitators can generate deep discussion and stimulate creative ideas by asking probing questions.

“A good question is never answered. It is not a bolt to be tightened into place but a seed to be planted and to bear more seed toward the hope of greening the landscape of idea.” – John Ciardi

The Oxford English dictionary defines “probe” as “seek to uncover information about something.”

Why should a facilitator ask probing questions?

Asking probing questions is a key facilitation technique. It involves the entire FMEA team, and can be used to encourage participation. See the article Facilitation Skill #1 – Encouraging Participation.

The FMEA facilitator can direct questions to an individual (expert) or the group to stimulate thinking. This facilitation technique is used to open up discussion and to bring it to a deeper level. Avoid “yes” or “no” questions which serve to close off the discussion rather than opening to more creative ideas.

What types of probing questions can be used?

There is no limit to the variety of probing questions that can be asked by FMEA facilitators. Any question that probes or stimulates discussion can be used. Here are a few examples.

  1. How would you describe the current situation regarding …?
  2. What has been done in the past regarding …?
  3. What has worked/not worked regarding …?
  4. What would have to happen for this problem to be completely solved?
  5. What do you (a team member) think of (another team member’s) idea?

The key is to get the team thinking and discussing the focus areas.

What is Socratic Questioning?

This portion of the article will explore Socratic Questioning, a technique originally developed and used by Soctrates in teaching. This same technique can be used when leading teams, in order to solicit deeper discussions and critical thinking. 

Named for Socrates (ca. 470-399 B. C.), the early Greek philosopher/teacher, a Socratic approach to teaching is based on the practice of disciplined, rigorously thoughtful dialogue. The instructor professes ignorance of the topic under discussion in order to elicit engaged dialogue with students. Socrates was convinced that disciplined practice of thoughtful questioning enables the scholar/student to examine ideas logically and to be able to determine the validity of those ideas. Also known as the dialectical approach, this type of questioning can correct misconceptions and lead to reliable knowledge construction. [reference Starting Point Entry Level Geoscience serc.carleton.edu]

Socrates argued for the necessity of probing individual knowledge, and acknowledging what one may not know or understand. Critical thinking has the goal of reflective thinking that focuses on what should be believed or done about a topic.

Socratic questioning adds another level of thought to critical thinking, by focusing on extracting depth, interest and assessing the truth or plausibility of thought. Socrates argued that a lack of knowledge is not bad, but students must strive to make known what they don’t know through the means of a form of critical thinking.

Socratic Questioning can be applied to teams as well as students.

Examples of Socratic Questioning

[Reference website: positivepsyvchology.com/Socratic-questioning]

When used effectively, Socratic questioning is a compelling technique for exploring issues, ideas, and thoughts. It allows misconceptions to be addressed and analyzed at a deeper level than routine questioning.

Examples of different types of Socratic questions 

Clarification

What do you mean when you say X?
Could you explain that point further?
Can you provide an example?

Challenging assumptions

Is there a different point of view?
What assumptions are we making here? Are you saying that… ?

Evidence and reasoning

Can you provide an example that supports what you are saying?
Can we validate that evidence?
Do we have all the information we need?

Alternative viewpoints

Are there alternative viewpoints?
How could someone else respond, and why?

Implications and consequences

How would this affect someone?
What are the long-term implications of this?

Challenging the question

What do you think was important about that question?
What would have been a better question to ask?

Application tip

Probing questions are best used to address areas that need more discussion, and to ensure you are getting balanced involvement by the entire team.

Next article

The next article in the FMEA Facilitation series is called Asking Thought-Starter Questions. Not every FMEA team member has a full grasp of the definitions and concepts of FMEA. One way to ensure the team is focusing on the right concepts is to use “thought-starter questions.” Asking for the elements of FMEA in different ways helps the team think deeply, and gets better results.

[display_form id=415]

Filed Under: Articles, Inside FMEA, on Tools & Techniques Tagged With: Facilitation

About Carl S. Carlson

Carl S. Carlson is a consultant and instructor in the areas of FMEA, reliability program planning and other reliability engineering disciplines, supporting over one hundred clients from a wide cross-section of industries. He has 35 years of experience in reliability testing, engineering, and management positions, including senior consultant with ReliaSoft Corporation, and senior manager for the Advanced Reliability Group at General Motors.

« Where do the Typical Control Chart Signals Come From?
The “new normal” can be much better »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Carl Carlson
in the Inside FMEA series

[popup type="" link_text="Logo Info" ]

Information about FMEA Icon

Inside FMEA can be visually represented by a large tree, with roots, a solid trunk, branches, and leaves.

- The roots of the tree represent the philosophy and guiding principles for effective FMEAs.
- The solid trunk of the tree represents the fundamentals for all FMEAs.
- The branches represent the various FMEA applications.
- The leaves represent the valuable outcomes of FMEAs.
- This is intended to convey that each of the various FMEA applications have the same fundamentals and philosophical roots.

 

For example, the roots of the tree can represent following philosophy and guiding principles for effective FMEAs, such as:

1. Correct procedure         2. Lessons learned
3. Trained team                 4. Focus on prevention
5. Integrated with DFR    6. Skilled facilitation
7. Management support

The tree trunk represents the fundamentals of FMEA. All types of FMEA share common fundamentals, and these are essential to successful FMEA applications.

The tree branches can include the different types of FMEAs, including:

1. System FMEA         2. Design FMEA
3. Process FMEA        4. DRBFM
5. Hazard Analysis     6. RCM or Maintenance FMEA
7. Software FMEA      8. Other types of FMEA

The leaves of the tree branches represent individual FMEA projects, with a wide variety of FMEA scopes and results. [/popup]

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy