Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Evaluating Facilitator Skills

by Carl S. Carlson 4 Comments

Evaluating Facilitator Skills

How to Evaluate the Skills of a Facilitator?

Leading is about learning to be a facilitator – Ashif Shaikh

Ask yourself, when teams work very well together, what are the positive characteristics of the team leader? When teams are dysfunctional, and have poor outcomes, what skills of the leader need to be improved?

Let’s talk about facilitators

Giving proper feedback is a great way to help a colleague improve FMEA facilitation skills. Carefully listening to feedback from a colleague is an important way to improve one’s own FMEA facilitation skills. Both are aided by understanding and using facilitation quality objectives.

What are facilitation quality objectives?

Simply stated, facilitation quality objectives are observable quality characteristics of excellent facilitation. They are distilled from experience observing and evaluating facilitators from all levels of skill. They are meant to be a short list of the primary quality objectives, not an exhaustive list of traits.

How are quality objectives used?

Facilitation quality objectives can be used in different ways. Here are some examples:

  • As part of a company program to evaluate and improve facilitator skills.
  • As part of personal development to improve one’s personal facilitation skills.
  • As part of FMEA facilitator training.

Examples of facilitation quality objectives

The following are examples of facilitation quality objectives. This is not meant to be a complete list; the examples are included for illustration purposes only. They can be modified or developed based on experience of what works and what does not work.

Example Quality Objective 1: Facilitator should keep the discussion moving efficiently through the FMEA and not allow distractions or side conversations.
Evaluation: Describe how well the facilitator kept the discussion on target.

Example Quality Objective 2: Facilitator should probe and encourage balanced input from all team members and not allow any one person to do most of the talking.
Evaluation: Describe how well the facilitator encouraged participation.

Example Quality Objective 3: Facilitator should ensure the team applies correct FMEA definitions and concepts and keep team from getting confused.
Evaluation: Describe how well the facilitator demonstrated knowledge of FMEA fundamentals.

Example Quality Objective 4: Facilitator should use different thought-starter questions and avoid merely asking for the column heading.
Evaluation: Describe how well the facilitator used thought-starter questions while leading the meeting.

Example Quality Objective 5: Facilitator should speak clearly, with sufficient volume, and show a high level of interest, so that everyone on the team understands and is able to participate in the meeting.
Evaluation: Describe how clearly the facilitator spoke and the level of interest that was maintained.

Example Quality Objective 6: Facilitator should keep the meeting moving as quickly as possible, spending more time on higher-risk issues and less time on lower-risk issues.
Evaluation: Describe the overall pace of the meeting and how well the facilitator kept it moving.

Additional evaluation criteria:

What did the facilitator do especially well? Please describe:

Did the facilitator encounter a specific challenge or difficulty that could be improved? Please describe:

Giving feedback in a positive way

Feedback needs to accurate, specific, positive, meaningful, instructive, and generate a willingness to improve. So, what if your evaluation of a colleague reveals problems or issues. How do you communicate your feedback in a positive way?

Example: Mary is evaluating Bill’s performance as an FMEA team leader. She notices that he allows one of the extroverts on the team to dominate the discussion, and the rest of the team stays quiet. At the end of the meeting, Mary wants to provide good feedback.

Wrong way: “Bill, you did a poor job of facilitating and allowed someone to dominate the meeting.”

Right way: “Bill, one of the team members did most of the talking; the results would be better if you encouraged others to contribute more. I suggest working on the skill of encouraging participation.”

Tips

Learning to be a good facilitator is not easy. One suggestion is to begin by co-facilitating with another more experienced facilitator, where you can each go back and forth leading the team. At the end of the meetings, ask your colleague to provide candid and specific feedback, and listen carefully.

Next article

This completes the FMEA Facilitation Series. The next series of articles will be on topics received from readers.

[display_form id=415]

 

Filed Under: Articles, Inside FMEA, on Tools & Techniques Tagged With: Facilitation

About Carl S. Carlson

Carl S. Carlson is a consultant and instructor in the areas of FMEA, reliability program planning and other reliability engineering disciplines, supporting over one hundred clients from a wide cross-section of industries. He has 35 years of experience in reliability testing, engineering, and management positions, including senior consultant with ReliaSoft Corporation, and senior manager for the Advanced Reliability Group at General Motors.

« OECD Risk Management Maturity Model
Choosing Fire And Gas Detectors For LNG Facilities »

Comments

  1. Manajemen Pesaran says

    October 25, 2024 at 6:14 AM

    How well did the facilitator prepare the materials and activities before the session started?
    Regard Administrasi Bisnis

    Reply
    • Carl S. Carlson says

      October 31, 2024 at 12:43 PM

      Hello Manajemen,
      Another insightful question.
      When I facilitate an FMEA, I ensure that the preparation steps of FMEA are completed before the first full meeting of the subject-matter experts, either by doing the preparation steps myself, or ensuring they are done by someone else. There are ten articles in the FMEA preparation series on the Accendo Reliability website. Here is link to the entire Inside FMEA series of articles. If you cursor down you will get to the FMEA Preparation Series.
      Hope that helps.
      Carl

      Reply
  2. Manajemen Pesaran says

    October 25, 2024 at 6:15 AM

    Does the facilitator have a deep understanding of the topic to be facilitated?
    Visit us IT Telkom

    Reply
    • Carl S. Carlson says

      October 31, 2024 at 12:37 PM

      Hello Manajemen,
      This is such a great question. Fred and I just did a podcast on this topic, which will be coming out soon.
      The answer to the question is that the facilitator has to have enough knowledge of the subject topic, in order to keep the discussion on track, and avoid lengthy off-topic discussions. In addition, the facilitator should know enough about the subject so that the subject-matter experts do not feel they need to explain how the system works in the middle of the meeting, which can waste considerable time.
      The facilitator does not need to be a subject-matter expert in the subject being facilitated. However, the facilitator does need to have knowledge and experience in the skills of facilitation, which is covered in my FMEA facilitation series.
      Let me know if this answers your question.
      Carl

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Carl Carlson
in the Inside FMEA series

[popup type="" link_text="Logo Info" ]

Information about FMEA Icon

Inside FMEA can be visually represented by a large tree, with roots, a solid trunk, branches, and leaves.

- The roots of the tree represent the philosophy and guiding principles for effective FMEAs.
- The solid trunk of the tree represents the fundamentals for all FMEAs.
- The branches represent the various FMEA applications.
- The leaves represent the valuable outcomes of FMEAs.
- This is intended to convey that each of the various FMEA applications have the same fundamentals and philosophical roots.

 

For example, the roots of the tree can represent following philosophy and guiding principles for effective FMEAs, such as:

1. Correct procedure         2. Lessons learned
3. Trained team                 4. Focus on prevention
5. Integrated with DFR    6. Skilled facilitation
7. Management support

The tree trunk represents the fundamentals of FMEA. All types of FMEA share common fundamentals, and these are essential to successful FMEA applications.

The tree branches can include the different types of FMEAs, including:

1. System FMEA         2. Design FMEA
3. Process FMEA        4. DRBFM
5. Hazard Analysis     6. RCM or Maintenance FMEA
7. Software FMEA      8. Other types of FMEA

The leaves of the tree branches represent individual FMEA projects, with a wide variety of FMEA scopes and results. [/popup]

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy