Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Essence of Reliability Centered Maintenance, and Risk Assessment

by Nancy Regan 1 Comment

Essence of Reliability Centered Maintenance, and Risk Assessment

Essence of Reliability Centered Maintenance, and Risk Assessment

My not-so-dirty-little-secret, the Essence of Reliability Centered Maintenance, and Risk Assessment all at once…

I’m going to tell you a not-so-dirty-little secret about myself. I love No-Limit Texas Hold-‘Em poker. 

I’m a tournament poker player – not cash. Every year at Thanksgiving, my husband and I journey to Las Vegas to indulge in my favorite hobby.

Deep into a poker tournament, the best players have a mountain of chips in front of them. (I usually only manage to accumulate a ‘hill.’) 

I’ve had my share of tournament cashes, but I’ve never “hit it big.” So my goal this year was to make a ‘five-figure’ cash.

Fast forward to day three of our trip. 

While getting ready for a tournament at the Venetian, I happened to have the sitcom Seinfeld on the television. It was the episode where George Costanza does everything “opposite” of what he would normally do in an effort to turn his life around for the better. 

That gave me an idea. “This time” I said to myself, “It’s going to be different.” 

You see, I’m a decent player, but I err on the conservative side. I don’t take big risks at the table. But big risks are what get you a mountain of chips.

So there it was. I would be like George and do the opposite of what I would normally do in “risky” spots. 

But I had to temper the strategy and, as I finished putting on my makeup, I decided to do so using Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM).

(I told you RCM principles are versatile!)

(RCM is an amazing process. Learn more about it here: https://rcmtrainingonline.com/rcm-info/)

Each player started with 15,000 tournament chips. About an hour into play, I got into a spot where two players went “all-in” ahead of me. I had to risk my stack of about 17,000 chips to win the nearly 34,000 that were already in the pot.

I was holding the 9, 10 of spades. The board read Jack, Queen of spades and the 10 of hearts. I had a straight flush draw. In poker lingo, I had a ton of “outs.”

I assumed (correctly as it turned out) that one of my opponents had flopped a Queen-high straight and the other was on a smaller flush draw than I.

(Sometimes you can just feel it.)

In my mind, RCM rode in on its white horse to rescue me. 

First, consequence assessment.

If I call and make my flush or a better straight than my opponent, I more than triple up and start to build my mountain. If I call and miss all of my outs, I’m out of the tournament.

Now on to risk. What’s my risk here? 

If the assumptions I made about my opponents’ hands were correct, I had about a 40% chance of winning. Not horrible. (We’re talking about poker, not a fire suppression system.)

So, in the context of RCM, was I willing to accept the consequence of being knocked out of the tournament in this particular scenario? And, was the level of risk acceptable to me?

Yes and yes!

I announced “I’m all in” and my opponents grumbled. One because he had to fade a better straight or a flush – and the other because he was holding 5, 4 of spades. He was drawing nearly dead.

My heart raced – but not for long. 

The dealer quickly peeled off the deuce of spades on the turn and I won the hand with the better flush.

The dealer pushed me the pot and I silently thanked George.

I used the same strategy for the next six hours: consequence and risk assessment. 

Then I got into a hand that made me my “mountain.”

I was first to act and raised with AJ of hearts. It folded to a guy who announced he was “all in.”

Hmmm….I thought. Stereotypically, a man can get a woman to easily fold with a big bet – unless she has a monster hand (which I didn’t). 

But in this particular hand, I wasn’t Nancy. I was George. And George does the opposite.

My opponent could just be making a move with an inferior hand just because he thinks I’d fold. Or…he really could have a better hand.

I carefully applied RCM principles.

Here was my risk assessment. If he’s just trying to push me around, I have about a 70% chance to win. 

At worst, if he has a better hand, I’m a “dog” and I only have a 30% chance to beat him.

But I still had a chance – no matter what he held.

I silently asked myself: “Are you willing to accept the consequences of getting knocked out in this particular spot?”

Yes.

“Is the level of risk acceptable to you?”

Yes!

I said “I call.”

My opponent slammed his better hand down on the table – Ace, King of clubs.

I stood up and turned over my AJ hearts. Ughhhh…only a 30% chance to win.

The dealer burned the top card, swiftly counted out the next three cards, and then quickly spread them face-up on the table.

Some players gasped. Others yelled “no way!”

The near-impossible happened.

It was nothing less than a poker miracle.

Not only did I flop my flush…

…but what appeared, only had a one in 650,000 chance of happening.

King – Ten – Queen of hearts graced the felt.

I flopped a Royal Flush – the stone-cold “nuts.” The absolute best poker hand.

My opponent fumed.

He yelled at me and said I was “stupid” for calling. 

Maybe.

But it wasn’t me he was yelling at.

It was George.

The dealer pushed me the pot and I gleefully stacked over 180,000 in tournament chips.

I continued to play the same strategy – and the poker gods remained on my side.

That night, I bagged up 426,000 tournament chips to finish play the next day.

Day 2:

Early in day two, I accumulated 990,000 tournaments chips (my personal best) using RCM principles (and by being George). 

I finally made my mountain!

And then, just like that, it was gone. My poker luck ran out.

I lost my nearly 1,000,000 chips in one hand.

It wasn’t my fault – or even George’s.

It was just poker. I played it right. But my hand just didn’t hold up.

Still, I finished 23rd out of 848 players.

Not bad.

Although I didn’t make a five-figure cash as I had hoped, I did pretty well that day.

And I owe it all to Reliability Centered Maintenance – and of course – to George!

(You can use RCM to accomplish so much! Learn more here: https://rcmtrainingonline.com/training/)

So the next time you want to change the oil quickly and don’t want to take time to put the jack stands in place, ask yourself if it’s worth being crushed to death.

Or how about forgoing safety glasses because the job you’re going to do in your home wood shop is quick and easy? Is it really worth your sight? 

My worst case scenario was being knocked out of a poker tournament. 

Serious risk puts precious gifts like lives, limbs, sight, and hearing in danger. 

What are the consequences? What is the risk? 

Those may be the two most important questions you’ll ever ask yourself .

If you’d like to learn more about RCM, visit us here: https://rcmtrainingonline.com/training/

Filed Under: Articles, Everyday RCM, on Maintenance Reliability

About Nancy Regan

Nancy Regan is a leading authority on Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM).   She has over 20 years’ experience of hands-on practice facilitating RCM analyses, conducting RCM training, and assisting her clients in implementing RCM programs.  With RCM, she helps organizations achieve goals such as reducing maintenance costs, identifying the cause of chronic failure, and shifting from a reactive to a proactive maintenance environment.  Nancy also helps people overcome the organizational challenges that are in the way of creating an effective Reliability Culture.

« Markov Approximation to Standby-System Reliability
How Mother Nature and Father Time Creates Reliability and Availability in the Universe »

Comments

  1. Larry George says

    August 18, 2022 at 3:58 PM

    Nice plays. RCM = Risks, Cards, and Money. Are you using a system? My friends were kicked out of casinos in the 1960s for using Scarne.
    Stay tuned for article on choosing failure rate patterns for RCM and for failure rate patterns that don’t fit Nolan and Heap patterns, from the 1960s, without life data.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Nancy Regan
in the Everyday RCM series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy