Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Are You Driving The Wrong Behaviours?

by James Kovacevic 2 Comments

Are You Driving The Wrong Behaviours?

Are You Driving The Wrong Behaviours?

Use a Balanced Scorecard to Ensure the Right Behaviours are embedded in Your Organization.

This post is the third of a miniseries on Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). If you haven’t already, please go back and read the first post on what is a KPI and the second post on leading Vs Lagging KPIs.

As already discussed, KPIs can be a great tool to measure progress, predict future performance and hold personnel and teams accountable. In order to use KPIs to accomplish these objectives, the KPIs need to be aligned with the organization’s goals. However when cascading goals from the organization’s goals to the department and individual level one must be careful to avoid embedding the inappropriate behaviour. For example if the organization is focused on reducing costs, costs can be reduced in the short term by stopping all PM routines, but long term costs will certainly increase.   This is not the intent of the organization’s goal, but may be a by-product of assigning a single goal to a department or individual. A balanced scorecard is design to alert managers if the organization is meeting expectations and prevent this inappropriate behaviour.

The balanced scorecard ensures that the organization is meeting expectations across multiple perspectives.   By using multiple perspectives the ability for the organization to balance and measure strategic short and long term goals is achieved. How is a balanced scorecard developed and designed for a maintenance department? The reminder of this post will walk through how to create a balanced scorecard for your department.

Balanced Scorecard Design

The balanced scorecard should focus on the strategy of the business and the maintenance department, by translating the vision into operational goals. Instead of including all of the KPIs or metrics, the balanced scorecard should consist of a few financial and non-financial KPIs. These select KPIs will ensure that the leadership can quickly review the performance, provide feedback and if necessary adjust the strategy. The KPIs will fall into one of the four perspectives.

Four Perspective Approach

Financial: encourages the identification of a few relevant high-level financial measures that align with the business goals. These may include $/CARV, Maintenance Cost per Unit, Spares Cost /CARV, Stock Turns, etc.

Customer: encourages the identification of measures that answer the question “How do customers see us?” In the case of maintenance, the operations team is the customer. The KPIs selected need to reflect the service provided to them. These include % Downtime, Availability, Time to Process a Work Request, Schedule Adherence, etc.

Internal business processes: encourages the identification of measures that answer the question “What must we excel at?” These KPIs should reflect how well the maintenance process is functioning. The measures may include wrench time, schedule adherence, % of planned work, storeroom stock outs, etc.

Learning and growth: encourages the identification of measures that answer the question “How can we continue to improve”. This ensures the organization continues to improve, and may be measured by % of continuous improvement work, training hours per maintenance employee, % of accredited employees, etc.

Within each of the perspectives, numerous Maintenance KPIs can be utilized, so choosing the right KPIs can be difficult. Remember that the balanced scorecard is designed to ensure the short and long term goals of the business are accomplished, without driving inappropriate behaviour.   Keeping this in mind, we need to remember Newton’s 3rd law, for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. If you translate this to Maintenance KPIs, it means that if we put in a financial measure that has the potential to drive inappropriate behaviour, we must put in an equal and opposite KPI to balance it. Keeping this in mind, a Maintenance & Reliability Scorecard will ensure all behaviours are aligned with the culture and vision of the business.

A Maintenance & Reliability Balanced Scorecard

To ensure maximum value is provided to business, a Maintenance & Reliability scorecard has been developed by High Performance Reliability. This scorecard takes into account many of the variables within a manufacturing environment, regardless of industry, ensuring the business objectives are met. All targets will vary depending on the business goals, and as such, they should be adjusted to reflect the needs of the business. This scorecard has been made available for download to our readers, by clicking this link ***LINK***. The scorecard does not include the KPI definitions, however SMRP ***LINK*** has an excellent resource on the definitions of the KPIs in their Best Practice Guidelines.

23. kpi best practice guideline

Figure 1 Maintenance Balanced Scorecard

If you already have a balanced scorecard, what KPIs are you using? If you don’t have one, did you try the one above and what results did you experience? I encourage you to share your stories, as everyone benefits from sharing.

Remember, to find success, you must first solve the problem, then achieve the implementation of the solution, and finally sustain winning results.

I’m James Kovacevic
HP RELIABILITY
Solve, Achieve, Sustain

Filed Under: Articles, Maintenance and Reliability, on Maintenance Reliability Tagged With: Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

About James Kovacevic

James is a trainer, speaker, and consultant that specializes in bringing profitability, productivity, availability, and sustainability to manufacturers around the globe.

Through his career, James has made it his personal mission to make industry a profitable place; where individuals and manufacturers possess the resources, knowledge, and courage to sustainably lower their operating costs.

« UAV’s Coming to Your Neighborhood
10 Things an Operations Supervisor Can Do To Improve Reliability »

Comments

  1. Ron White says

    November 20, 2022 at 7:15 AM

    I have a site that having issues with communicating between office and the maintenance staff.
    Which results in less work being done and more finger pointing. Which leaves to residents complaining of work not being done.

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      November 20, 2022 at 8:00 AM

      Hi Ron, Getting out of the blame games is tough and may take someone shifting the goal from what one or another department does and instead focus on how we (together) are going to improve the situation for customers. cheers, Fred

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Maintenance & Reliability series


by James Kovacevic

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy