Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Does Your Dog Have More Empathy Than You Do?

by JD Solomon Leave a Comment

Does Your Dog Have More Empathy Than You Do?

Does Your Dog Have More Empathy Than You Do?

The comment is a common one.


“It does not surprise me that they do not want to save $60,000,” quipped the second-in-command of the electrical department. “They are more concerned with being popular and helping their friends.”


“By ‘they,’ I assume you mean the Board and me as the interim Town Manager?” I asked.“Well, not really you, but them – yes,” came a frustrated response.


I decided to move to a more productive line of discussion.


“Here is the math,” I stated. “We have a $20 million annual budget, which equates to over $1.6 million per month in spending. Sixty grand is indeed sixty grand, but at the same time, it is a relatively small amount of the annual budget. And there are five other issues on the agenda that have savings of more than $60K.”


“Sixty thousand is real money to my department,” responded the second-in-command. “We can’t afford to waste that amount of money.”


“We all agree on that, and we need to do what it takes in the short-term to minimize it,” I stated as I moved to close the discussion. “The Board understands the issue and will not forget it. They will move on it, but it may not be as soon as you would like. Timing is everything, and the decision is theirs, not ours.”

Empathy

Empathy is the ability to place someone in another person’s (or species’) mental or spiritual position. While the concept of “putting yourself in someone else’s shoes” is widely accepted, there are several issues with it related to effectively communicating to decision makers on issues with high degrees of complexity and uncertainty.


The first is whether (or how) it is possible to vicariously understand the feelings, thoughts, and experiences of a person in a role that we have never experienced. Even if we have been in a similar position, how do we understand a senior decision maker in an objectively explicit manner – which includes the decision maker’s experiences, emotions, and biases but does not include ours.


The second issue related to effectively communicating to decision makers is whether empathy is a learned skill or a natural trait. Educators and psychologists believed that empathy had to be taught for many years. The view that empathy may be more natural than learned has gained popularity in recent decades. After all, how does your dog know?


FINESSE is the mnemonic for remembering the basics of effective communication: Frame, Illustrate, Noise, Empathy, Structure, Synergy, and Ethics. The first E in FINESSE stands for Empathy.

Decision Makers Have Many Strategic Decisions

Strategic decisions are characterized by high degrees of complexity and uncertainty. These decisions usually take months or years to resolve. The allocation of resources (the decision) is not trivial.


Our decision makers believe they are making the biggest decisions of their lives or careers when confronted with strategic decisions. And they probably are. The lesson is that it DOES NOT matter how simple, routine, straightforward, or logical the trusted advisor believes the decision is. It matters what the decision maker thinks.


Our decision makers also are making more than one strategic decision at any given time. As trusted advisors, we only deal with one or two of these decisions.


Success depends on finding empathy for the decision maker and being able to communicate on those terms.

We Have a Hard Time Making Decisions

On the one hand, most humans do not want to be responsible for harming others. Bad things may happen in this world, but we do not want our actions to have caused them.


On the other hand, most senior managers do not have patience. Their ascent through the ranks required making tens of tactical decisions each day. Making good strategic decisions requires making one good decision each week or each month. Many decisions makers subconsciously and incorrectly believe they are not contributing if they are not making decisions.


Between the two hands, decision makers may balk at making a strategic decision for one of three reasons:

  1. They may not understand
  2. They may not wish to allocate the resources
  3. The TIMING may not be right

The trusted advisor really only contributes to the first. As in the story at the beginning of the article, the second two are in the decision maker’s control.

Get To The Point

An outcome of empathy is understanding and appreciating that decision makers do not have enough time. Empathy also leads us to realize that decision makers will ask you for more details when they are ready to allocate resources. Or perhaps not at all. Being empathetic means that all that you do is about the decision maker, not about you.


The number one question you should ask yourself is, “Why did they ask you to present?” Get to that answer in the presentation as quickly and concisely as possible. Being empathetic means doing the hard work to listen and understand what the decision maker needs. These are a few things that senior decision makers appreciate when you are asked to effectively communicate related to issues with high levels of complexity and uncertainty.

  • Provide your conclusions in the beginning, whether a written or verbal presentation
  • Maintain similar presentations at all levels
  • Get advice from someone in the inner circle
  • Share your written information report before the presentation
  • State your credentials early
  • Share your role in the process
  • Highlight any other underlying perspectives
  • Trust that questions will be asked to the degree needed by the decision maker
  • Know when it is time to leave

Communicating with FINESSE

Putting yourself in someone else’s shoes in an objective manner is tough, especially when you have never been in their role or situation. It is a big task. Empathy starts with understanding that it is all about the decision maker, not you.


Is empathy a learned skill or a natural trait? Probably some of both, which means some people are naturally more effective communicators and others have to work at being effective communicators much harder. Whatever it takes, the responsibility for effective communication of a message belongs to the sender (trusted advisor), not the receiver (decision maker).


The first E in FINESSE stands for Empathy.


Communicating with FINESSE is the home of the community of technical professionals dedicated to effective communication in the face of complexity and uncertainty. Sign-up for updates on the second edition of JD Solomon’s book “Communicating Reliability, Risk, and Resiliency to Decision Makers: How to Get Your Boss’s Boss to Understand.”

Filed Under: Articles, Communicating with FINESSE, on Systems Thinking

About JD Solomon

JD Solomon, PE, CRE, CMRP provides facilitation, business case evaluation, root cause analysis, and risk management. His roles as a senior leader in two Fortune 500 companies, as a town manager, and as chairman of a state regulatory board provide him with a first-hand perspective of how senior decision-makers think. His technical expertise in systems engineering and risk & uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation provides him practical perspectives on the strengths and limitations of advanced technical approaches.  In practice, JD works with front-line staff and executive leaders to create workable solutions for facilities, infrastructure, and business processes.

« Defect Elimination 101
Railway Maintenance and Depreciation »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of JD SolomonArticles by JD Solomon
in the Communicating with FINESSE article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy