Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / DOE – what are you?

by Semion Gengrinovich Leave a Comment

DOE – what are you?

DOE – what are you?

The history of Design of Experiments (DOE) can be traced back to the work of various individuals, including Genichi Taguchi, a Japanese engineer and statistician. Taguchi made significant contributions to the field, particularly in the area of robust design, which aimed to improve the quality of products and processes. His work was influenced by the need for quality improvement in post-World War II Japan. Taguchi’s methodology, known as the Taguchi methods, was based on the concept of “robust parameter design,” which aimed to make processes and products insensitive to environmental factors or other variables that were difficult to control.

The development of Taguchi methods was influenced by the work of Ronald Fisher, who proposed a methodology for designing experiments in the early 20th century. Fisher’s work laid the foundation for the development of experimental design techniques, which were later popularized by Taguchi. Taguchi’s methods, including fractional factorial designs and orthogonal arrays, were successfully applied and adopted by Japanese and Indian industries, and subsequently embraced by the US industry.

The main objective of Design of Experiments (DOE) is to systematically and efficiently study the relationship between multiple input variables in order to achieve the following purposes:

  1. Hitting a Target: Determining the optimal settings for key process input variables to achieve a specific target or goal.
  2. Maximizing or Minimizing a Response: Optimizing a response variable, such as maximizing product yield or minimizing defects.
  3. Reducing Variation: Identifying and reducing sources of variation in a process to improve consistency and quality.
  4. Making a Process Robust: Developing a process that is insensitive to variation in input variables or external factors.
  5. Seeking Multiple Goals: Balancing multiple competing objectives to find a set of input variable settings that achieve the best overall performance.

DOE is a powerful tool that allows for the manipulation of multiple input factors simultaneously, enabling the identification of important interactions and the effects of the factors on the desired output. By conducting carefully planned and executed experiments, DOE provides valuable information about the factors that control the value of a parameter or group of parameters, leading to improved process performance and quality.

The L8 matrix is designed to help identify the most significant factors affecting a process or product while minimizing the number of experimental runs. It is particularly useful for studying the effects of a small number of factors and their interactions on a response variable, as well as for reducing the impact of noise factors on the system.

A typical L8 matrix in Taguchi design is shown below:

In this matrix, the columns represent the control factors, and the rows represent the runs (combinations of factor levels). Each cell represents the factor level for that run.

The factors and factor interactions can be determined from the matrix. For example, in the L8 matrix above, the factors are A, B, C, D, E, F, and G. The interactions can be identified based on the columns that change between the runs.

When there are only three noise variables, the remaining columns in the L8 array can be used to estimate the interactions between certain noise factors.

The threshold of 2 levels means that each factor should be varied at 2 levels to study its effect on the response variable. The levels should be chosen such that they represent the typical range over which the factor is expected to vary in practice. This can be based on historical data, engineering knowledge, or other relevant information about the system under study. It’s important to note that the choice of factor levels should be based on the specific context of the problem and the goals of the experiment. The levels should be chosen to provide meaningful information about the factors’ effects on the response variable, while also being feasible to implement in the actual system or process.

For example, one of outcome the results can looks like follow:

H6 – is the signal that has major impact, H1 is next in ranking then H2,H3,H7, and almost no impact it is H4, H5.

In summary, DOE provides a more comprehensive and efficient approach to studying and optimizing processes or products, leading to improved quality, reliability, and performance compared to traditional testing methods

Filed Under: Articles, on Product Reliability, Reliability Knowledge

About Semion Gengrinovich

In my current role, leveraging statistical reliability engineering and data-driven approaches to drive product improvements and meet stringent healthcare industry standards. Im passionate about sharing knowledge through webinars, podcasts and development resources to advance reliability best practices.

« Hybrid Project Management Methodology
Ten Things You Might Hear an Ineffective Reliability Professional Say »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Reliability Knowlege series logo Photo of Semion GengrinovichArticles & Videos by Semion Gengrinovich
in the Reliability Knowledge article & video series

Recent Posts

  • Leadership Values in Maintenance and Operations
  • Today’s Gremlin – It’ll never work here
  • How a Mission Statement Drives Behavioral Change in Organizations
  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy