Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Dependency Concept in RAM Analysis

by André-Michel Ferrari Leave a Comment

Dependency Concept in RAM Analysis

Dependency Concept in RAM Analysis

Assets or components in an operation can be dependent on each other. The network of equipment contributing to the operation output is complex and intricate. A RAM model helps account for the complexities including dependencies.

The fundamental purpose of Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability (RAM) modeling is quantifying system performance, typically in a future interval of time. A system is a collection of items whose coordinated operation leads to the output, generally a production value. The collection of items includes subsystems, components, software, human operations, etc. For example, an automobile is a system. Its sub-components being the drivetrain, engine, gearbox, etc. In RAM models, it is crucial to account for relationships or dependencies between items. This helps determine the final output of the system. In various industries, RAM models have proven to be effective as cost avoidance or decision-making tools, as well as their ability to confirm or counter stated assumptions by internal stakeholders.

What is a Dependency in a System?

Dependency refers to the quality or state of being dependent. It implies relying on someone or something for support, influence, or determination. In the case of equipment in an operating network, they rely on each other’s state of operation to work or not. If one component is down it might trigger the shutdown or start of another. Listed below are dependency types.

1. Network Dependency

For example, Diagram 1 below represents a centrifugal pump broken down into its critical components. The components are in a series configuration. The failure of any component leads to the shutdown of the entire system. Therefore, the operation of the entire system is dependent on all its components being in a functioning state.

Diagram 1 – Centrifugal pump broken down in its critical components placed in a series configuration.

2. Standby Dependency

Equipment that operate in a standby mode alternate between being up or down. The operating status of one unit is dependent on that of the other unit. Diagram 2 illustrates this.  The system has 2 pumps placed in a parallel configuration. Only 1 pump is required to run for the system to be up. The other is on “hot” standby. If Pump 1 is operating, Pump 2 is in a hot standby mode. Hot standby means that Pump 2 is ready to start operating as soon as Pump 1 stops operating for whatever reason. This could be a failure or the need for maintenance.

Diagram 2 – Centrifugal pumps working in standby mode with one pump required at all times.

3. Deterioration Dependency

The concept of deterioration or degradation dependency is more prevalent in repairable systems.

A repairable system is expected to fail multiple times over its life. It will be restored to as close as possible to its original functional state. Failures on this system will occur more and more frequently over time. A good example of a repairable system is an automobile. Changing a failed component such as the gearbox will get the car going again, but the rest of the original components such as the engine or drivetrain will retain the same amount of wear, making the whole automobile “as good as it was just before it failed.”

The deterioration of one component is dependent on that of another. It is akin to secondary damage. For example, the deterioration of a bearing in a pump will over time, especially if left unchecked, lead to other failures such as mechanical seal or shaft damage.  

In the analysis of a system it is important to account for those types of dependencies. Treating them in isolation would lead to errors in the analysis. This happens in FMEAs (Failure Modes and Effects Analysis).  Dependencies are not considered in the FMEA analysis. This does not mean that the FMEA is a poor process in itself. It is on the contrary extremely useful in identifying all the correct failure modes. However once those modes are identified, their dependencies should be taken into account. A RAM model will integrate all the dependencies and correctly project the future operating performance of the asset.

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, The Reliability Mindset

About André-Michel Ferrari

André-Michel Ferrari is a Reliability Engineer who specializes in Reliability Analytics and Modeling which are fundamental to improving asset performance and output in industrial operations.

André-Michel has approximately 30 years of industrial experience mainly in Reliability Engineering, Maintenance Engineering, and Quality Systems Implementation. His experience includes world-class companies in the Brewing, Semiconductor, and Oil & Gas industries in Africa, Europe and North America.

« How About Weibull Instead of MTBF?
Weibull Distribution Part-1 »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Reliability Mindset logo Photo of André-Michel FerrariArticles by André-Michel Ferrari
in the The Reliability Mindset: Practical Applications in Industry article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy