Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Delivering The Bad News, Safely

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Delivering The Bad News, Safely

Delivering The Bad News, Safely

Reliability engineering includes delivering bad news. This piece of equipment will fail soon, this design won’t survive outdoor use.

We start early with engineering judgment on design weaknesses. Continue by organizing groups to evaluate and comment on what will likely fail. We test, prod, poke and force failures to occur. Then we tally the actual performance and compare that to the what we hoped.

We are the bearers of bad news all too often.

So how do you avoid the stigma attached to that bad news? 

Guilt by Association

“The nature of bad news infects the teller.” Shakespeare

The phrase of ‘don’t kill the messenger,” originated from ancient Greece and Persia where messengers bearing bad news were slain. Likewise, if the message was good the messenger was treated as a hero. In either case, the messenger was not the cause of the news, just relaying a message.

If a prototype fails in an environmental test at nominal temperatures, the design, assembly, the prototype designed and built by others failed. Yet, you know as I do, that letting the program manager about the failure is dangerous. You are not likely to be slain on the spot, yet more likely infected with the taint of the bad news.

Take solace in the fact others in the business of delivering bad new likewise feel the wrath of the recipients. Weathermen, doctors, and the USP driver all enjoy comments, disdain or joy, and praise depending on the news.

It is something we do, we associate our response to information, good or bad, to the messenger even if they are simply the messenger. Being aware of this behavior arms you with the knowledge to help you avert the consequences of the association or at least lessen it a bit.

Be a Friend or Trusted Advisor First

Deliver good news early and often. Smile. Deliver on time or early. Be someone that your team likes. Build relationships with your co-workers and teammates such that they like you.

Be pleasant. Snarling about traffic or the weather associates you with the bad weather. Complaining the slow barista for your morning coffee associates that response to slowness to you. Instead, mention how well the car’s heated seats are working. Or, mention the funny conversation you enjoyed while standing in line.

It is being positive, upbeat, genuinely the ‘glass is half full’ kind of person that increases your likability. If you happen to be attractive or wear a suit well, you have an advantage, others tend to like you based solely on appearance.

The point is our day to day behavior builds our reputation and our relationship with those we will eventually bring bad news. It is harder to respond harshly to someone that we like.

Deliver Bad New Well

If a prototype displays an unexpected failure, and we know revealing that information may carry by association an unwanted backlash, what can you do? Ignoring the information or asking someone else to deliver the message are not really viable or helpful.

Instead, try to minimize the association with the news. Here are three techniques that you may consider when next delivering bad news.

1. Just the facts.

Instead of saying the prototype failed to meet the reliability performance goals, describe the test conditions, the measurements, and the readings. Let the recipient draw the conclusion. This is difficult to do given the ‘get to the point’ nature of business meetings, yet in a report, or presentation, or conversation, you do not have to (always) state the conclusion.

2. Stay Out of the Line of Fire

If making a presentation do not stand in front or near the screen. If presenting a written report, set it off to the side. If demonstrating the failure with a prototype, move away from the equipment before saying anything about the failure.

By physically lining up with the presentation, report, or prototype, you are easily associated with the source of the bad news. By shifting to the side, and if possible to the same side of the table and referring to the presentation, report, or device as our common enemy that we, the good guys, need to address, you align with the receiver of good news.

Saying ‘how dare that prototype over there (across the table or room) fail!’ is quite different then, ‘This prototype (right here in my arms) failed.’

3. Sandwich the Bad News

This one I learned when learning how to coach competitive youth soccer teams. Start with something possible, “good hustle on that play”. Then mention something that needs improvement, “that left foot pass could be a bit sharper.” Then follow up with something positive, “you maintained excellent field position on that attack.” I learned that in order for the soccer player to actually hear the constructive criticism, they first had to be listening. Sharing something positive helped them to actually hear the suggestion and not just hear a complaint or disapproval.

If the first iteration with a co-worker is to grumble about the lack of parking, you are associated with the difficulty of finding parking near your office. Whereas if you start with something positive about how good the coffee is smelling this morning, then mention the need to find a better way to find parking, you take the edge off the negative association of poor parking conditions.

When always delivering bad news it is too easy for others to discount or dismiss the news as you ‘always are complaining’, or ‘nothing is good enough for you’.

Summary

We identify faults with products and systems, it is what we do. The delivery of the failure news doesn’t have to stick to you. The taint of unwelcome or unwanted news doesn’t have to create a ‘kill the messenger’ response.

With a little work and effort, you can disassociate with the bad news and you can be likable, both of which help you effectively deliver bad news without getting shot.

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability Tagged With: Influence, Speaking and presenting

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Telematics Data – Contour Plots and Multiple Parameter Analysis
The 2 Parameter Normal Distribution 7 Formulas »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Fred Schenkelberg
in the Musings series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy