Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Creating a Successful Crisis Management Plan

by Greg Hutchins Leave a Comment

Creating a Successful Crisis Management Plan

Creating a Successful Crisis Management Plan

Guest Post by Bill Pomfret (first posted on CERM ® RISK INSIGHTS – reposted here with permission)

Safety Projects International Inc. discusses how to handle different types of crises that may arise at your facility. If 2020 has shown us anything, it’s that we need to adapt to outside elements that may affect your team processes and procedures. Let’s get started on a crisis management plan.

Crisis Management

A crisis may come in many forms, such as a natural disaster, a global pandemic, loss of power and water supply, a cyberattack, an operational accident, violent threats, or supply chain issues. In a manufacturing environment, a crisis is defined as an unexpected event or situation that can threaten an organization’s business, cause harm to the health and safety of employees and consumers, disrupt operations or damage a company’s brand or reputation. An organization’s reaction to and the consequences of a crisis can vary significantly for each company, depending on factors such as crisis preparedness, maturity, size and scale of operations and financial viability. The COVID-19 pandemic has made most organizations aware of vulnerabilities in anticipating, preparing for, responding to and managing crises. There has been a renewed awareness of the importance of a robust crisis management plan (CMP) and a focus on business continuity.

What to Do and Where to Start

Planning can help an organization contain and mitigate the negative effects of a crisis. The reaction of an organization to a crisis speaks to its culture and reflects its leadership. The way that business leaders prepare for and respond to disruptive events can determine how they recover and become resilient.

In a 2018 Deloitte survey of organizations from around the globe, 47% of those without a crisis management plan reported that their finances were negatively impacted by a recent crisis, compared to 31% of those that did have a plan.1

Similarly, a 2019 PwC global crisis survey of various organizations from different industries across the globe found that organizations that emerged stronger from a crisis had implemented preparatory measures (such as having a CMP in place) in anticipation of a crisis.2

Safety Projects International Inc. recognizes the importance of crisis management and how having a process affects business continuity. NSF International’s GMP registration and certification programs include requirements for organizations to implement a CMP to address situations or emergencies arising from a crisis that may impact their ability to deliver a safe product. The purpose of a CMP is to prepare an organization to respond quickly to a crisis, minimize the harm and restore operations in an effective and efficient manner.

Business continuity and the implementation of a CMP is the responsibility of each employee, department, the crisis management plan team, executive management, and the board of directors.

Steps in Developing and Maintaining a CMP

  1. Assess Company Threats

A starting point is to identify the industry threats and those unique to your organization, location or region, market, products and processes. After identification, assess threats for likelihood and the expected severity of the impact. Next, identify warning signs for each crisis. These assessments will assist with prioritizing actions and allocating resources.

Examples of questions to ask during the assessment process:

What are the potential threats to your organization that could result in a crisis, thus impacting your ability to deliver a safe product?

How vulnerable is your organization to these threats?

What are the potential impacts of the crisis?

How will the crisis impact the operations at the site?

What mechanisms does your organization currently have to track and respond to these potential threats?

  1. Develop a Crisis Management Plan

According to the 2019 global study, three characteristics comprise successful crisis management: preparedness, a fact-based approach and effectiveness of stakeholder communications. The study also found that while it is a positive sign that most senior executives want to own and be involved in preparing for and responding to a crisis, an overlap of roles and responsibilities may occur. This can affect effective and efficient coordination, communication, and decision-making during a crisis.3

A CMP serves as a guidebook for an organization to navigate the different situations that can arise from a crisis and who is responsible for each item. An effective CMP has the following elements:

Form the crisis management team: Define and assign responsibilities for gathering information and for initiating, coordinating, and overseeing crises responses

Establish sources of credible and information

Find resources for expert and legal advice

Determine management responsibility

Define lines of authority and accountability (hierarchy)

Establish escalation process for decisions

Establish strategies for internal communications

Define tools, routes, and responsibilities for communications

Set a process for disseminating and sharing information between crisis management team and employees

Draft key messaging and talking points

Establish strategies for external communications

Define tools, routes, and responsibilities for communications

Set a process for communication with authorities, regulatory agencies, stakeholders, media, and the public

Draft key messaging and talking points

Establish detailed action plans for identified crises

Define controls to ensure a response does not compromise product safety

Set measures to identify and isolate product affected by the crisis

Identify availability of resources and provisions for back-up sources for critical systems

Define and track key performance indicators (KPIs)

Set measures to evaluate and determine disposition of affected product

  1. Test the Crisis Management Plan

To quickly execute a CMP during a crisis, it is important to perform a periodic exercise or simulation to test the plan. Practices or drills of different crisis situations can reveal an organization’s strengths as well as gaps in the level of preparedness. After the challenge, the team should analyze what went well and what did not and update the CMP accordingly. In testing the crisis management plan, the organization must include the impact to product safety as well as the safety of its employees.

Providing crisis management training and including all personnel in the test scenarios will make them aware of the CMP. This will empower personnel to be proactive when a crisis does arise, including knowing whom to inform.

  1. Monitor Threats and Review the CMP

Disruption to an organization’s business can occur when it is least expected, so it is important that an organization looks ahead and assesses potential threats, whether internal or external. As the business environment changes, the CMP may need to be updated as well. The CMP must be reviewed on a periodic basis to ensure it will still be effective in the event of an actual crisis.

Business Continuity

In addition to having a CMP to respond quickly to a crisis, an organization must also have a plan in place to continue operations during an incident and recover from the crisis. Business continuity planning is an ongoing process to ensure that the necessary steps are taken to identify the impact of potential losses and maintain viable recovery strategies, recovery plans and continuity of services.4 A business continuity plan (BCP) is the document that contains these strategies.

Interrelation of CMP with BCP

The process of developing a BCP is like developing a CMP. The BCP incorporates all hazards (human-caused events, technological issues, and natural hazards) and a risk assessment to understand the business impact to people, infrastructure, operations, the environment, economic conditions, regulatory and contractual obligations, and reputation.

The analysis identifies what is an unacceptable impact for loss of information, critical processes, function, and applications, among other factors.

Senior management then establishes a prevention strategy based on the results of hazard identification and risk assessment, impact analysis, program constraints, operational experience, and cost-benefit analysis. Prevention includes training, monitoring of the quality management system, testing the BCP at a determined frequency and performing exercises to ensure the program is working. Finally, mitigation strategies must be applied to ensure measures are taken to limit or control the consequences, extent or severity of an incident that cannot be prevented.

Business continuity and the implementation of a CMP are the responsibility of each employee, department, the crisis management plan team, executive management, and the board of directors.

Summary

Preparing a CMP and BCP takes resources, time, and effort, but it is imperative that an organization is vigilant to possible new threats while continuing to monitor existing ones. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown that a crisis can occur unexpectedly and from unanticipated sources. An organization can emerge better, stronger, and more resilient from a crisis if it can anticipate and assess potential threats and has a plan in place to quickly respond and recover.

Bio:

Dr. Bill Pomfret of Safety Projects International Inc who has a training platform, said, “It’s important to clarify that deskless workers aren’t after any old training. Summoning teams to a white-walled room to digest endless slides no longer cuts it. Mobile learning is quickly becoming the most accessible way to get training out to those in the field or working remotely. For training to be a successful retention and recruitment tool, it needs to be an experience learner will enjoy and be in sync with today’s digital habits.”

Every relationship is a social contract between one or more people.  Each person is responsible for the functioning of the team.  In our society, the onus is on the leader.  It is time that employees learnt to be responsible for their actions or inaction, as well.  And this takes a leader to encourage them to work and behave at a higher level.  Helping employees understand that they also need to be accountable, visible and communicate what’s going on

Filed Under: Articles, CERM® Risk Insights, on Risk & Safety

About Greg Hutchins

Greg Hutchins PE CERM is the evangelist of Future of Quality: Risk®. He has been involved in quality since 1985 when he set up the first quality program in North America based on Mil Q 9858 for the natural gas industry. Mil Q became ISO 9001 in 1987

He is the author of more than 30 books. ISO 31000: ERM is the best-selling and highest-rated ISO risk book on Amazon (4.8 stars). Value Added Auditing (4th edition) is the first ISO risk-based auditing book.

« The Evolution of Maintenance Practices
Why is Confidence Level »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CERM® Risk Insights series Article by Greg Hutchins, Editor and noted guest authors

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy