IV. Reliability Modeling and Prediction
A. Reliability Modeling
2. Reliability block diagrams and models (Create)
Generate and analyze various types of block diagrams and models, including series, parallel, partial redundancy, time-dependent, etc.
Even a simple series system model can help you and your team determine how best to create a reliable product.
Additional References
Reliability Block Diagrams Overview and Value (article)
The True Importance of Reliability Block Diagrams (article)
Series System (article)
Series Reliability Question (article)
Quick Quiz
1-23. Two components are connected in series and operate for one hour. If the mean time to failure for each component is 200 hours, what is the probability of failure of the two-component system?
(A) 0.001
(B) 0.002
(C) 0.010
(D) 0.020
(C) 0.010
A series model uses the following formula to calculate the system reliability (here the system is a two component system)
$$ R\left( t \right)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}{{{R}_{i}}\left( t \right)}$$
Given only the mean time to fail we can only use the exponential distribution function for the estimate. The reliability of a component at t = 1 hour given the mean time to fail is 200 hours is
$$ {{R}_{1}}\left( 1 \right)={{e}^{-\frac{1}{200}}}=0.995$$
Therefore the system reliability at t = 1 hours is
$$ {{R}_{1}}\left( 1 \right)=0.995\times 0.995=0.990$$
The probability of failure for t = 1 hour is 1 – Rs(1) = 1 – 0.990 = 0.010
1-47. A system is composed of five independent components connected in series, each having a failure rate of .00004
failures per hour. Assuming that the time to failure is exponential, determine the reliability of the system at 168 hours.
(A) 0.7146
(B) 0.9670
(C) 0.9802
(D) 0.9966
(B) 0.9670
The key here is the use of the reliability function for the exponential distribution along with the series system formula for system reliability. First calculate the reliability of one of the five components
$$ {{R}_{1}}\left( t \right)={{e}^{-\lambda t}}={{e}^{-0.00004\left( 168 \right)}}=0.9933$$
Then use the series system model which is the product of the reliability values in the series. Or, since all five components have the same reliability value, just raise the reliability value for one component to the 5th power.
$$ {{R}_{sys}}\left( t \right)=\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}{{{R}_{i}}=}{{0.9933}^{5}}=0.9670$$
1-49. A machine is composed of various parts functioning in series. How would you calculate the reliability of the machine?
(A) Sum of the individual part reliabilities.
(B) Calculate the product of the individual part reliabilities.
(C) Sum the probabilities of the individual part unreliabilities.
(D) Calculate the product of the individual part unreliabilities.
Calculate the product of the individual part reliabilities.
A series system reliability is determined by calculating the product of the relaiblity of the elements of the system.
While it is possible to sum failure rates in some circumstances (all elements are described by an exponential distribution) summing is the wrong function for reliability values. Remember that a reliability value has to be between 0 and 1, and summing would quickly tally above 1. The same holds for summing of unreliabilities.
We do use the product of unreliabilities as part of the calculation concerning parallel systems, not series systems.
1-52. Consider the following system:
The MTBF values for the components are as follows: A = 2,200 hours, B = 3,400 hours, C = 1,700 hours, and D = 1,200 hours.
Calculate this system‘s reliability at 400 hours?
(A) 0.0740
(B) 0.4198
(C) 0.8338
(D) 0.9540
(B) 0.4198
The key formula is for the series system reliability calculation, which is simply the product of the system element reliabilities. Given only MTBF we can calculate the reliability of each component using the exponential distribution reliability function
$$ R\left( t \right)={{e}^{-\frac{t}{\theta }}}$$
where θ is the component’s MTBF. Once you calculate each reliability value, take the product of the four reliabilities for the solution.
Another method, which may be a little quicker involves determining the failure rates then calculating the system reliability with the sum of the failure rates. The failure rate for a component is the inverse of its MTBF value. Following this approach we sum the inverses of the four MTBF values as such
$$ \begin{array}{l}{{\lambda }_{sys}}=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}{\frac{1}{{{\theta }_{i}}}=\frac{1}{2,200}+}\frac{1}{3,400}+\frac{1}{1,700}+\frac{1}{1,200}\\{{\lambda }_{sys}}=0.00045455+0.00029412+0.00058824+0.00083333\\{{\lambda }_{sys}}=0.00217023\end{array}$$
The calculate the system reliability using the exponential distribution reliability function using the calculated system failure rate
$$ \begin{array}{l}{{R}_{sys}}\left( t \right)={{e}^{-\lambda t}}\\{{R}_{sys}}\left( 400 \right)={{e}^{-(0.00217023)400}}\\{{R}_{sys}}\left( 400 \right)=0.4198\end{array}$$
1-53. If a component has a known constant failure rate of 0.0077 failures per hour, what can be concluded about the reliability of two of these components connected in series?
(A) The reliability is < 99% over an hour.
(B) The reliability is 99.23% over an hour.
(C) The reliability depends on the wear-out rate of a mating subsystem.
(D) The reliability cannot be determined without more information.
(A) The reliability is < 99% over an hour.
We do not know what else in the system nor over what time period the question of reliability applies. If we assume an hour duration, t = 1, I think this is a safe assumption since the failure rate is given as per hour. We can calculate the reliability over one hour with
$$ \begin{array}{l}{{R}_{sys}}\left( t \right)={{e}^{-\left( {{\lambda }_{1}}+{{\lambda }_{2}} \right)t}}\\{{R}_{sys}}\left( 1 \right)={{e}^{-\left( 0.0077+0.0077 \right)}}\\{{R}_{sys}}\left( 1 \right)={{e}^{-\left( 0.0077+0.0077 \right)}}=0.9847\end{array}$$
Any duration longer than an hour will further reduce this two component system further below 99%. Also, the calculation shows the reliability at an hour is 99.47% and not 99.23%.
Given the information available the only true statement is (A).
Ask a question or send along a comment.
Please login to view and use the contact form.
Fred,
In the lecture, you show component level reliability numbers at 0.9. 0.9^5 equates to 0.59 and not 0.95 as you mentioned in the video. I think you wanted to start with component reliability of 0.99, 0.99^5 does equate to 0.951.
Hi Mandar, you are correct it is .99 ^ 5 that I should have said. Good catch. thanks, Fred