Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Corrosion in Agitated Conditions

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Corrosion in Agitated Conditions

Corrosion in Agitated Conditions

Chemical corrosion occurs at increased rates in agitated conditions.

Typical iso-corrosion curves for alloy metals no longer apply. These curves only show corrosion rates at various chemical concentrations and temperatures in stagnant conditions.

A typical curve is shown below. The curves are available from alloy metal suppliers on request.

When metals are selected for agitated corrosive conditions the curves can only be used in a relative sense.

They help grade the metal selection but they cannot provide absolute corrosion rates.

V1E6-1-1

 

Corrosion barrier

Metals can develop a corrosion barrier when they come into contact with certain chemicals.

In some cases, this protective layer can be easily removed. Carbon steel in contact with 98% sulphuric acid forms a protective ferrous sulfate layer.

To prevent this protective layer from being removed the velocity of sulphuric acid in pipelines must be kept below 1 m/sec. Alloy steels when in contact with chemicals develop a corrosion barrier that protects the metal underneath.

In agitated conditions, this barrier is more easily removed and the fresh metal is exposed to renewed chemical attack.

The rate of protective layer removal is greatly increased in agitated conditions.

Agitated conditions include stirred vessels and tanks, mixers and agitators, pumps, pipelines, and valves.

An example of incorrect selection was with the bolts and nuts holding paddles on an agitator in a reactor mixing 50% sulphuric acid with a slurry of powder in water.

The operating temperature was 90 centigrade (195 F). The nuts and bolts installed to hold the agitator blades were wrongly chosen to be of 316 stainless steel and lasted two months.

Inspection of the iso-corrosion curve above for the process conditions indicates the unsuitability of the metal for this service.

Even a high alloy metal such as 904L would have limited life in the application.

The nuts and bolts were changed to Hastalloy C and have been in the same service for over two years.

 

 

Availability of metal

Another difficulty when selecting specialist alloys for agitated conditions is the availability of the metal in the form required, at an acceptable price.

Sometimes compromises are necessary between availability, price, and longevity. This situation can be seen with the construction of an agitator in contact with the chemicals mentioned previously.

Hastalloy C was preferred but it was only available from overseas with a long shipping delay and at a high price.

Locally 904L was available but the iso-corrosion curves indicated a limited life.

However previous experience with a similar grade alloy from a different supplier in the same service conditions indicated a life of about four years.

Because the choice of alloys was limited and repairs were required, the agitator shaft and paddles were constructed of 904L.

To date, they have been in service for over a year without obvious deterioration. Not an ideal selection but an acceptable one.

Use of the iso-corrosion curves combined with other available corrosion behavior data, such as pitting corrosion potentials, can be used to mix-and-match metals to reduce costs.

For example, a tank wall and floor in direct contact with the process chemicals may be made of a higher-grade alloy while the roof, which only sees the vapor, may be made of a lesser grade metal.

Pipeline equipment

Valves selected for corrosive services need to be designed to cope with agitated flow conditions.

Some valves cause much turbulence. Gate valves have recesses in their bodies that cause the flow to swirl in the gate pocket.

Under-and-over valves like globe valves cause the flow to twist up and around the plug and then turn back toward the outlet.

Even butterfly valves, with their disc projecting into the fluid flow cause some agitation.

When selecting valves for agitated conditions chose chemically compatible materials with wear resistance, which minimize turbulence and meet the pressure requirements of the process.

The selection of equipment in agitated corrosive conditions is difficult because both right and wrong decisions become expensive.

High grade and high-quality materials cost more and it is wasteful to specify exotic metals such as titanium if alloy steels could be used.

In contrast using materials of inadequate abilities will mean money is lost because a replacement is more frequent.

Alternate materials

In looking at better material selection for corrosive services it is useful to consider the use of non-metals.

Plastics can have excellent corrosion properties. Provided their temperature limits are respected they can be used to line the contact surfaces.

Fully Teflon lined plug valves have performed well in sulphuric acid pipelines.

Plastic lined pipes in corrosive service are common.

Corrosion resistant bricks and mortars have been successfully used as linings.

Fiberglass can be used provided the corrosion barrier layer is not worn away by abrasion.

Rubber lined valves, such as diaphragm valves, have been used for agitated corrosive conditions for decades. Rubber lined agitators have been installed into reactors.

The internals of pumps and pipes have been successfully protected with specialist epoxy coatings.

In-situ testing

Where the opportunity is available, the best method to confirm the suitability of a material is to put a test piece into the environment with which it must cope.

In the case of the 904L agitator mentioned previously, test coupons of other alloys have been welded to the agitator blades so they could undergo trial under the full service required.

If any prove to be more suitable than the 904L, the next agitator will be fabricated from that material.

Mike Sondalini – Maintenance Engineer

[ninja_form id=431]

If you found this interesting, you may like the ebook Bulk Materials Handling Introduction.

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, Plant Maintenance

About Mike Sondalini

In engineering and maintenance since 1974, Mike’s career extends across original equipment manufacturing, beverage processing and packaging, steel fabrication, chemical processing and manufacturing, quality management, project management, enterprise asset management, plant and equipment maintenance, and maintenance training. His specialty is helping companies build highly effective operational risk management processes, develop enterprise asset management systems for ultra-high reliable assets, and instil the precision maintenance skills needed for world class equipment reliability.

« Customer Reliability Expectations Change
Minimizing Career Path Risk »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by
Mike Sondalini
in the
Plant Maintenance series.

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Today’s Gremlin – It’ll never work here
  • How a Mission Statement Drives Behavioral Change in Organizations
  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy