Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Control Loops — Masters of Automatic Control

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Control Loops — Masters of Automatic Control

Control Loops — Masters of Automatic Control

What you will learn from this article.

  • Control loops automatically correct unwanted changes in a process.
  • A control loop consists of components to detect and adjust the process.
  • Control loop complexity reflects the accuracy and speed of control.
  • Explanation of ‘open loop’, ‘closed loop’, ‘feed back’, ‘feed forward’.

The sole purpose of using process control in, say, the making of beer, is to detect what is happening during manufacture and to decide if something needs to be changed to insure the beer meets the necessary specification. The key words are ‘to detect’, ‘to decide’, ‘to change’ and ‘to meet specification’. A control loop can do all these things automatically.

Control Loop Components

A control loop is made up of the components shown in Figure No 1. It consists of:

  • a sensor to detect the process,
  • a transmitter to make the sensor signal into an electrical signal,
  • a controller that tests that the signal meets a pre-set value and
    if not makes the adjustments required,
  • a final controlling element(s) that physically move and alter its
    position (e.g. a control valve),
  • a converter that changes an electrical signal into a proportional
    force or a force into an electrical signal (a transducer),
  • the medium (like steam, chilled water, etc) that provides the
    energy change to the process to produce the correction.
Figure No. 1 Feed Forward Control Loop Components

Control Loop Complexity

Control loop complexity depends on the final product specification. If the product acceptance range is wide then simple, inexpensive control loop components can be used. However if the required final product specification is demanding, the control loop becomes more complex and expensive. This is necessary in order to react fast enough to changing process inputs in-time to still produce the output product to specification.

Open and Closed Loops 

Very simple control loops that detect an incoming process variable and display the value to an operator are called ‘open loop’ control systems. In this case it is up to the operator to make any changes to the process. As soon as a final control element is added to allow incoming process variable adjustment the complexity and cost of the loop rises sharply. The final control element requires a decision-making device (the controller) to signal it to move. Such an arrangement is called a ‘closed loop’ control system because the sensor’s signal controls the reaction of the loop from the initially detected process change right through to the finally detected adjustment. The entire change starts and ends (closes) with the sensor detecting the proper required conditions.

Feed Back — Feed Forward Systems 

The requirements for the speed and accuracy of the control loop response determine whether ‘feed back’ or ‘feed forward’ control is used. Feed back control measures the final product and checks it is produced to within the specification tolerance. If it is not it within tolerance the final control element is adjusted to make corrections.

Feed forward control measures the incoming variables before they go through the process, making sure they are within preset tolerance before combining together to make the product. Feed forward control is the more complex and expensive method to use.

One can see that it is best to use the least complex and inexpensive control loop phylosophy possible. Complex loops require expensive components; great amounts of effort programming and tuning the controller; are easily ‘confused’ by abnormal process occurrences; require unending maintenance to retain their sensitivity; demand high levels of emergency spare parts and the presence of highly skilled operators and maintainers.

The right control loop choice can only be made when the product specification tolerance is well understood. If low cost control is required the product specification must have a wide range of customer acceptability. Tight tolerances add great cost.

Mike Sondalini – Equipment Longevity Engineer

Reference: Operative Certificate in Chemical Plant Skills Manual, Holmesglen College of TAFE, 1993

 

[ninja_form id=431]

If you found this interesting, you may like the ebook Process Control Essentials.

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, Plant Maintenance

About Mike Sondalini

In engineering and maintenance since 1974, Mike’s career extends across original equipment manufacturing, beverage processing and packaging, steel fabrication, chemical processing and manufacturing, quality management, project management, enterprise asset management, plant and equipment maintenance, and maintenance training. His specialty is helping companies build highly effective operational risk management processes, develop enterprise asset management systems for ultra-high reliable assets, and instil the precision maintenance skills needed for world class equipment reliability.

« Lessons from Scrum for Product Development Teams
Using the Maintenance Data You Already Have »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by
Mike Sondalini
in the
Plant Maintenance series.

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Today’s Gremlin – It’ll never work here
  • How a Mission Statement Drives Behavioral Change in Organizations
  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy