Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Changing the Service Duty of a Pump

by Mike Sondalini 2 Comments

Changing the Service Duty of a Pump

Changing the Service Duty of a Pump

What readers will learn in this article.

  • Centrifugal pumps can be moved to a new service.
  • The impeller size, impeller speed, and motor power need to match the new service.
  • That Similarity Law formula is used in calculating the new impeller size, speed, and motor power.
  • Introduction to centrifugal pump curves and their use.

When there is a need to determine a new service duty for a centrifugal pump, and no performance curves are available, the recommended method is to use the Similarity Laws. These laws are derived by the use of dimensional analysis in which selected variables affecting performance are grouped in such a way that permit prediction of scaling effects when the variables are altered. The laws are:

$$ \large\displaystyle\frac{{{Q}_{1}}}{{{Q}_{2}}}=\frac{{{N}_{1}}}{{{N}_{2}}}\frac{D_{1}^{3}}{D_{2}^{3}}\qquad\frac{{{H}_{1}}}{{{H}_{2}}}=\frac{N_{1}^{2}}{N_{2}^{2}}\frac{D_{1}^{2}}{D_{2}^{2}}\qquad\frac{{{P}_{1}}}{{{P}_{2}}}=\frac{{{\rho }_{1}}N_{1}^{3}}{{{\rho }_{2}}N_{2}^{3}}\frac{D_{1}^{5}}{D_{2}^{5}}$$

Where: Q is discharge flow in l/sec.
D is impeller diameter in mm.
ρ is density in kg/m3.
N is impeller speed in rpm.
H is discharge head in meters.

Subscripts 1 and 2 represent initial and final conditions respectively.

 

Figure 1 Set of pump curves
Figure 1 Set of pump curves

If in the equations above, the impeller diameter is held constant and the density is unchanged, the formulas reduce to the well-known Affinity Laws.

$$ \large\displaystyle\frac{{{Q}_{1}}}{{{Q}_{2}}}=\frac{{{N}_{1}}}{{{N}_{2}}}\qquad\frac{{{H}_{1}}}{{{H}_{2}}}=\frac{N_{1}^{2}}{N_{2}^{2}}\qquad\frac{{{P}_{1}}}{{{P}_{2}}}=\frac{N_{1}^{3}}{N_{2}^{3}}$$

The users of these laws put a lot of faith in their ability to predict the required changes to a pump to achieve a new duty. Once the pump is altered, it is costly to reverse. But how accurate are these formulas? To determine this, they are used to establish a new duty point for a centrifugal pump pumping water and the result compared to the published pump curves. The difference between the curves and the laws is then observable.

The calculations are for a commonly encountered situation where a pump’s delivery head is to be reduced. In this case, the impeller will require machining to a smaller diameter. The pump has an existing duty of 24 l/sec at the 64m head with an impeller of diameter 219 mm. If the impeller diameter is reduced to 195 mm what is the new duty point calculated by the Similarity Laws? The applicable curves for the 219 mm and 195 mm impellers are shown in Figure 1.

Changing impeller size affects both the pump discharge head and the flow. This requires the use of the Similarity Laws to calculate both the new head and the new flow.

START
POINT
CALCULATED
POINT
CURVE
POINT
PERCENT
DIFF.
Q1 = 24 l/sec
H1 = 64 m
D1 = 219 mm
N1 = 2900 rpm
Q2 = 16.9/sec
H2 = 50.7 m
D2 = 195 mm
N2 = 2900 rpm
Q2 = 17/sec
H2 = 50.7 m
D2 = 195 mm
N2 = 2900 rpm
negligible
negligible

If instead the impeller diameter is reduced to 180 mm we get the following results.

START
POINT
CALCULATED
POINT
CURVE
POINT
PERCENT
DIFF.
Q1 = 24 l/sec
H1 = 64 m
D1 = 219 mm
N1 = 2900 rpm
Q2 = 13.3 l/sec
H2 = 43.2 m
D2 = 165 mm
N2 = 2900 rpm
Q2 = 13.3 l/sec
H2 = 42.8 m
D2 = 165 mm
N2 = 2900 rpm
negligible
1

From the results of the calculations, it is clear that for this manufacturer’s pump the error in using the Similarity Laws is minor though it becomes larger the further the required duty point is from the existing duty point. These results provide some confidence in the use of the formulas. However, when the same method was used for another manufacturer’s pumps a discrepancy between the similarity laws and the pump curves of up to 7 percent was noted. The results are not always exact.

In situations where it is necessary to machine the impeller diameter down it is sensible to leave the impeller larger than calculated and reinstall it. Then establish the intermediate duty point and again calculate what impeller reduction is needed to attain the final required duty point.

For the alternate situation where a higher delivered head or flow is required, the Similarity Laws can be used to estimate the new faster impeller speed or to size a new larger impeller. When increasing the speed or the diameter of an impeller a higher head, flow and power draw result. The appropriate Similarity Law will provide a means to closely estimate the extent of the resulting change.

Mike Sondalini – Maintenance Engineer

DISCLAIMER: Because the authors, publisher, and resellers do not know the context in which the information presented in the articles is to be used, they accept no responsibility for the consequences of using the information.

[ninja_form id=431]

If you found this interesting, you may like the ebook Pumping Basics.

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, Plant Maintenance

About Mike Sondalini

In engineering and maintenance since 1974, Mike’s career extends across original equipment manufacturing, beverage processing and packaging, steel fabrication, chemical processing and manufacturing, quality management, project management, enterprise asset management, plant and equipment maintenance, and maintenance training. His specialty is helping companies build highly effective operational risk management processes, develop enterprise asset management systems for ultra-high reliable assets, and instil the precision maintenance skills needed for world class equipment reliability.

« Show me the Data
Descriptive Models of the Design Process »

Comments

  1. Maintenance software says

    May 8, 2016 at 9:01 AM

    It looks like that use of similarity law is very useful in calculating accurate values of the impeller speed or size (diameter) according to required head or flow. A tiny computer program should rather be used to calculate these values for the purpose of accuracy and error free calculations.

    Khan
    Fincio.com

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      May 8, 2016 at 9:47 AM

      Hi Khan, agree a program or app would be a useful too. Knowing how the app comes up with the value is also worth understanding. Do you have a recommendation for an application that can do these calculations? cheers, Fred

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by
Mike Sondalini
in the
Plant Maintenance series.

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy