Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / To Change the Reliability Culture

by Fred Schenkelberg 2 Comments

To Change the Reliability Culture

To Change the Reliability Culture

Have you ever wished your organization would work together to achieve a reliable product? Not just a few individuals and a heavy reliance on the reliability team to focus on highlighting and fixing reliability issues.

Some organizations tend to react to reliability issues. Prototype testing and field returns continue to surprise the team. The worst organization fall into finding someone to blame. Better organizations set to work to understand the problem and quickly resolve the issue. Some have better ‘fire departments’ than others.

Responding quicker is not really the best way to deal with reliability.

The very best organizations prevent issues from creating surprises.

If you are in an organization that tends to react rather than prevent, how do you set about to change the culture? Change by itself is often difficult, and here we want to change the way nearly everyone addresses product reliability.

Here are few ideas that you may find useful as you approach this challenge. These ideas have been foundational for at least five corporate level, organization-wide, culture shifts focused on a change in how the teams approach product reliability. Of course, there is still more to learn, yet the basic structure to invoke culture change seems to be sound.

1. Reflect the current situation back to the organization

An assessment that examines the current way the organization includes reliability in their discussions and decisions, creates a picture of the process, tools, and attitudes that form the current culture concerning reliability.

Is the organization simply saying ‘reliability is important’ and then focusing on other priorities? This often occurs when reliability is difficult to measure whereas cost is directly measured. How are tools such as FMEA and ALT being used in the organization? If done only to satisfy a checklist, that is one approach. If done to prioritize work and understand specific failure mechanisms then that is simply another approach. Either way, the degree that the organization selects and uses tools to make decisions is a reflection on the overall culture.

Create a short report that includes what the organization does well, areas for improvement, and specific recommendations. The reflection of the current practices is not a judgment, just a reflection. Make the current program visible and available for examination.

2. Create an image (vision) of what could be

If working to change a culture, what would success look like? How would you know the culture has actually changed?

Be specific.

Include concrete examples of what customers are saying, market share graph, the sounds in the office or factory, comments from co-workers, etc. Paint a strong sensory image of what it will feel like when the culture has changed. Make it compelling.

One technique is to describe the ‘day in the life’ scenario highlighting the changes that the proposed cultural change will affect.

3. Map out the steps to attain the goal

A compelling vision is a goal, and it is insufficient to motivate change across your organization. Provide a roadmap or plan to make it happen. Be clear about obstacles and hurdles that the organization will overcome. The idea is to show how to get started. Explain the first step and how that will lead to the steps necessary to achieve the objective.

For changes to an overall reliability program, the steps may include

  • improved data analysis
  • changes in ways we request data from vendors
  • the creation of a reliability/availability model
  • starting to use HALT or FMEA

And other tasks specific each specific to the needs of the organization as they step toward the objectives.

4. Set expectations

Within a larger organization, you should set expectations for key individuals (change agents, respected individuals, community links). This creates a very clear connection between their role in the organization and the proposed changes.

With a handful of influential (note: these folks may or may not be managers, they are the leaders within your organization independent of their title) individuals working together to achieve change, it is very likely the change efforts will succeed.

5. Provide support and encouragement along the way

Change is hard work.

It involved personal risk, learning new processes or techniques, and moving away from the known to the unknown. Change does not occur with a single meeting or announcement. You will need to be regularly involved all along the way, especially at the start.

Some best practices include:

  • Continuous encouragement of attempts to move along the proposed path
  • Support to answer questions, provide training, and shore up confidence
  • Regular check-ins with key change agents to understand hurdles and suggest ways to overcome obstacles
  • Reward successes
  • Highlight value obtained along the way

The improvement a reliability program provides the unique hurdle of changes today do not immediately reduce warranty, for example. Many of the reliability improvements have a significant delay before the benefits are realized. Providing tools and processes to estimate future value are essential. Teach your team how to calculate value based on actions today that improve reliability.

Showcase significant progress and associated value.

Summary

Change happens – you can make it happen in your organization. Reliability culture change may take the coordination of one person and the support of a small team. The change of the conversation to include data, value, and customer reliability expectations may be sufficient to significantly prevent reliability problems.

Change will not be easy and will take some time to accomplish. In my experience, it seems to take three cycles of product development to create permanent change.

With clear assessment of the current situation, a vivid vision for the future, a basic guide to get everyone started, and the regular addition of your energy to continue making progress, change is possible.

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability Tagged With: Assessments, Change Management, Reliability plan

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Sources of Reliability Data
Types of Failure Data »

Comments

  1. Jason Davidson says

    December 23, 2017 at 12:41 AM

    Hi Fred,
    What a great article. Very clear and to the point. Our company has just set up a reliability team that I’ll be leading and the 5 stages you have outlined have given me some structure to get started down the road of implementing a culture of reliability.
    Thanks,
    Jason

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      December 23, 2017 at 7:38 AM

      Thanks for the note and enjoy the journey – should be fun and challenging. cheers, Fred

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Fred Schenkelberg
in the Musings series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy