Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Archives for Articles

Articles

Find all articles across all article series listed in reverse chronological order.

by Adam Bahret Leave a Comment

Be Aware of Why You Don’t Have Problems

Be Aware of Why You Don’t Have Problems

I see many organizations that feel a great sense of victory when they solve a current issue that has been plaguing their product.  

It may be a field issue that took a product that was performing flawlessly to a steeply increasing failure rate “out of nowhere”.  

Customers are angry, management is angry, everyone is angry and afraid.  It seems to go on forever and the end is unknown.  Then just as suddenly as the issue arose, a solution is found that puts the universe back in order.  

The team celebrates, goes back to the day to day tasks that keep the machine running and there is a sense of calm.  But the unspoken nervousness of waiting for the next issue to pop up is there.  

There is nothing to do but just wait.  A new one will arise, maybe tomorrow, maybe in six months, maybe next year.  

Mid-maturity vs High-maturity culture

“But that is the way it is and there isn’t much that can be done about it”. 

That is the mindset of a Mid-maturity reliability culture.  A High-maturity reliability culture doesn’t have to just sit and wait for the next “gremlin strike”.  

The reason is that not only do they know what caused the last issue,  they also know why they currently aren’t having any issues.  It is a subtle but big difference.  

The High-maturity reliability culture has in place an ongoing program that studies the variabilities that can occur in their product manufacturing and usage.  This program uses methods such as specialized testing and analysis that supports mitigations in design, manufacturing, and product usage.  

Now the organization isn’t just not having issues, they know why they aren’t having issues!

But in reality, it’s just pitfalls we fall into because we simply aren’t willing to study the road up ahead.


Related:

5 Steps to Building a Reliability Culture (article)

Purpose of a Reliability Program (article)

How to Assess Your Reliability Program (article)

Filed Under: Apex Ridge, Articles, on Product Reliability

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Environmental and Use Factors

Environmental and Use Factors

The definition of reliability includes four elements.

One of them is the intended environment where the device or system will experience a range of stresses.

The knowledge of where and how an item will operate enables:

  • The proper design to meet customer expectations
  • The essential durability during transportation, storage, and use
  • The complete accounting of applied stresses and their variations
  • The effective application of stress mitigation or reduction techniques
  • The efficient installation and monitoring of stress tracking

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Reliability in Design and Development Tagged With: Environment and use profiling or characterization

by Fred Schenkelberg 3 Comments

Petri Nets for System Reliability Modeling

Petri Nets for System Reliability Modeling

A Petri net graph is a depiction of a system using a symbolic language.

The modeling permits the analysis of complex systems or networks of systems.

It is possible to include elements of the system that are neither function or failed. In other words, it permits modeling a system when one or more of the elements are in a degraded state or under repair.

Petri net modeling is useful when the repair/restore times are long compared to operating times, as reliability block diagrams and fault tree analysis approach assume short or insignificant repair times, in most cases. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability Tagged With: Petri net modeling

by James Reyes-Picknell Leave a Comment

The Maintenance Management Excellence Path

The Maintenance Management Excellence Path

There are no quick fixes

Today’s world contains a myriad of choices for instant gratification.

Regardless of our age, we have grown used to getting what we want, when we want it, and how we want it limited only by our ability and willingness to pay for it. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Conscious Asset, on Maintenance Reliability

by Tim Rodgers Leave a Comment

Is Your Company Really Committed to Quality?

Is Your Company Really Committed to Quality?

In a recent post, I wrote about suppliers who claim to be committed to quality but may not actually behave that way.

Before getting too carried away with improving quality in the supply chain, it’s probably a good idea to understand your own company’s commitment to quality, although I see nothing wrong with holding your suppliers to a higher standard.

It may seem impressive when businesses highlight quality as a core value, something that’s published on their website and displayed on their walls, but is that just for show?

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Managing in the 2000s, on Leadership & Career

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Asset Management – Quality is a Mindset

Asset Management – Quality is a Mindset

Some quality paradigms are expensive

ABSTRACT

Some quality paradigms are expensive.

Quality is a mindset! When a wise man is given the chance to buy quality items he does so because quality pays for itself.

A quality item lasts longer, runs better and looks good when others fade. To change the way you think about quality takes a lot of experience with using poorer options. When you are sitting down with your head in your hands wondering what can be done to get costs down, to get production up and how you are going to hit the key performance indicators, remember the importance of quality equipment, quality systems, quality training and your quality mindset!

Keywords: quality control [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, Plant Maintenance Tagged With: Asset management

by Greg Hutchins Leave a Comment

Poor Reliability: A Risk to Production

Poor Reliability: A Risk to Production

Guest Post by John Ayers (first posted on CERM ® RISK INSIGHTS – reposted here with permission)

Reliability is designed into a product.  Quality is built into a product.  Poor reliability is long term, difficult and expensive to rectify because it is woven into the fabric of the product.

Quality is a relative short term problem because once the badly written procedure, non-compliant material or poor workmanship is identified, it usually can be fixed relatively quickly with minimal impact to the program. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, CERM® Risk Insights, on Risk & Safety

by James Kovacevic Leave a Comment

The Next Step in Your Failure Data

The Next Step in Your Failure Data

Improve your failure data to improve the speed and accuracy of your failure & reliability analysis.

Part 5 of 7

A few years into your reliability journey, you start to struggle to make the improvements you were able to when you first started.

Why is this?  You were able to systematically eliminate all of the low hanging fruit using the existing data in your CMMS.  But now you have to dig deeper to realize the improvements and that requires better data. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Maintenance and Reliability, on Maintenance Reliability Tagged With: Failure data

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Additional Reliability Specification for Your Supplier

Additional Reliability Specification for Your Supplier

Beyond the part reliability specification, you may also add conditions or requests to your reliability specification for your supplier.

The communication with your supplier should include sufficient information that they fully understand your reliability performance expectations. When buying or contracting with a supplier, you are the customer.

Be clear about your reliability requirements including constraints and conditions.  [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Reliability in Design and Development Tagged With: Requirements

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

When is Best Time to Establish Reliability Goals?

When is Best Time to Establish Reliability Goals?

The best time is at the product conception. The second best time as early as possible in the product development process.

It may change. Be refined. Altered later.

That is fine, yet the initial concept needs the boundary condition of a reliability goal. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability Tagged With: Reliability goal setting

by Tim Rodgers Leave a Comment

Are Your Suppliers Really Committed to Quality?

Are Your Suppliers Really Committed to Quality?

Suppliers always declare their commitment to the highest standards of quality as a core value, but many have trouble living up to that promise.

I can’t tell you how many times I’ve visited suppliers who proudly display their framed ISO certificates in the lobby yet suffer from persistent quality problems that lead to higher cost and schedule delays.

Here’s how you can tell if they’re really serious:

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Managing in the 2000s, on Leadership & Career

by nomtbf Leave a Comment

Are the Measures Failure Rate and Probability of Failure Different?

Are the Measures Failure Rate and Probability of Failure Different?

Old machinery enjoyed a failure rate, which one though?Are the Measures Failure Rate and Probability of Failure Different?

Failure rate and probability are similar. They are slightly different, too.

One of the problems with reliability engineering is so many terms and concepts are not commonly understood.

Reliability, for example, is commonly defined as dependable, trustworthy, as in you can count on him to bring the bagels. Whereas, reliability engineers define reliability as the probability of successful operation/function within in a specific environment over a defined duration.

The same for failure rate and probability of failure. We often have specific data-driven or business-related goals behind the terms. Others do not.
If we do not state over which time period either term applies, that is left to the imagination of the listener. Which is rarely good.

Failure Rate Definition

There at least two failure rates that we may encounter: the instantaneous failure rate and the average failure rate. The trouble starts when you ask for and are asked about an item’s failure rate. Which failure rate are you both talking about?

The instantaneous failure rate is also known as the hazard rate h(t)

$latex \displaystyle&s=3 h\left( t \right)=\frac{f\left( t \right)}{R\left( t \right)}$

Where f(t) is the probability density function and R(t) is the relaibilit function with is one minus the cumulative distribution function. The hazard rate, failure rate, or instantaneous failure rate is the failures per unit time when the time interval is very small at some point in time, t. Thus, if a unit is operating for a year, this calculation would provide the chance of failure in the next instant of time.

This is not useful for the calculation of the number of failures over that year, only the chance of a failure in the next moment.

The probability density function provides the fraction failure over an interval of time. As with a count of failures per month, a histogram of the count of failure per month would roughly describe a PDF, or f(t). The curve described for each point in time traces the value of the individual points in time instantaneous failure rate.

Sometimes, we are interested in the average failure rate, AFR. Where the AFR over a time interval, t1 to t2, is found by integrating the instantaneous failure rate over the interval and divide by t2 – t1. When we set t1 to 0, we have

$latex \displaystyle&s=3 AFR\left( T \right)=\frac{H\left( T \right)}{T}=\frac{-\ln R\left( T \right)}{T}$

Where H(T) is the integral of the hazard rate, h(t) from time zero to time T,
T is the time of interest which define a time period from zero to T,
And, R(T) is the reliability function or probability of successful operation from time zero to T.

A very common understanding of the rate of failure is the calculation of the count of failures over some time period divided by the number of hours of operation. This results in the fraction expected to fail on average per hour. I’m not sure which definition of failure rate above this fits, and yet find this is how most think of failure rate.

If we have 1,000 resistors that each operate for 1,000 hours, and then a failure occurs, we have 1 / (1,000 x 1,000 ) = 0.000001 failures per hour.

Let’s save the discussion about the many ways to report failure rates, AFR (two methods, at least), FIT, PPM/K, etc.

Probability of Failure Definition

I thought the definition of failure rate would be straightforward until I went looking for a definition. It is with trepidation that I start this section on the probability of failure definition.

To my surprise it is actually rather simple, the common definition both in common use and mathematically are the same. There are two equivalent ways to phrase the definition:

  1. The probability or chance that a unit drawn at random from the population will fail by time t.
  2. The proportion or fraction of all units in the population that fail by time t.

We can talk about individual items or all of them concerning the probability of failure. If we have a 1 in 100 chance of failure over a year, then that means we have about a 1% chance that the unit we’re using will fail before the end of the year. Or it means if we have 100 units placed into operation, we would expect one of them to fail by the end of the year.

The probability of failure for a segment of time is defined by the cumulative distribution function or CDF.

When to Use Failure Rate or Probability of Failure

This depends on the situation. Are you talking about the chance to failure in the next instant or the chance of failing over a time interval? Use failure rate for the former, and probability of failure for the latter.

In either case, be clear with your audience which definition (and assumptions) you are using. If you know of other failure rate or probability of failure definition, or if you know of a great way to keep all these definitions clearly sorted, please leave a comment below.

Filed Under: Articles, NoMTBF Tagged With: Failure Rate

by James Reyes-Picknell Leave a Comment

Rapid Proactive Maintenance Program – PM Program – Part 3

Rapid Proactive Maintenance Program – PM Program – Part 3

In the first installment of this series, we described the basics behind proactive maintenance and some of the considerations users need to make.

The second installment described RCM programs – the “gold standard” if you like for program development. This third installment describes what you can do if you realize you need a program but have nothing. It would also work if you’ve got a PM program but you are unhappy with the results you are getting. Chances are that something is missing or not being done often enough.

We’ve often encountered maintenance programs that are lacking. They need a stronger proactive component and they need it quickly to get things under control.

This guideline is intended to help to get things under control. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Conscious Asset, on Maintenance Reliability

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Shaft Sealing with a Packed Gland

Shaft Sealing with a Packed Gland

What you will learn from this article:

  • How shaft packing works.
  • What to consider when selecting and using shaft packing.
  • Good installation practices.
  • Proper commissioning of shaft packing.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, Plant Maintenance

by Greg Hutchins Leave a Comment

US Federal Enterprise Risk Management Requirements

US Federal Enterprise Risk Management Requirements

Guest Post by Greg Hutchins (first posted on CERM ® RISK INSIGHTS – reposted here with permission)

Last year, we reported that White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB – executive office) is requiring US departments to design and implement Enterprise Risk Management (ERM).  The requirements are part of the OMB Circular A 11 Section 270 – Performance and Strategic Reviews.

US Departments are:

expected to manage risks and challenges related to delivering the organization’s mission. ERM is a strategic discipline that can help agencies to properly identify and manage risks to performance, especially those risks related to achieving strategic objectives.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, CERM® Risk Insights, on Risk & Safety Tagged With: Risk management process

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 219
  • 220
  • 221
  • 222
  • 223
  • …
  • 251
  • Next Page »

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Leadership Values in Maintenance and Operations
  • Today’s Gremlin – It’ll never work here
  • How a Mission Statement Drives Behavioral Change in Organizations
  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy