Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Cascade Effect Thinking — Disruptive Paradigm Shifting

by Greg Hutchins Leave a Comment

Cascade Effect Thinking — Disruptive Paradigm Shifting

Cascade Effect Thinking — Disruptive Paradigm Shifting

Guest Post by David Parishkoff (first posted on CERM ® RISK INSIGHTS – reposted here with permission)

If Knowledge is Power, then understanding the cascading factors that shape our destiny can potentially offer Disruptive Knowledge and Decisive Power. Cascade Effect Thinking (CET) is a new paradigm that dynamically discovers the truth about interacting threats and opportunities in unique, analytical and gamified ways.

What is Cascade Effect Thinking?

CET is a rigorous, analytical approach and tool set to identify, quantify, and mitigate cascading internal and external organizational risk factors. CET uses gamified analytics to identify pre-crisis (not post-crisis) cascading threats that can lead to unfavorable events. It solicits candid and anonymous inputs from all organizational levels – leadership, mid-management and non-management (triangulation). CET exposes systemic risks and best practices in an organization’s decisions, culture, processes, responses to critical situations and feedback loops. CET applies standard systemic risk assessment criteria within 40 families of patent pending and gamified analysis techniques.

We Never Saw It Coming

Too often, we misdiagnose tipping points and underestimate the collective effects of multiple triggers. We can’t see the slow accumulation of interacting threats can build up exponential levels of energy. This was the case with the 2007-09 housing bubble burst that triggered a global financial and economic meltdown. When these bubbles burst, we tend to blame the last straw that broke the camel’s back. We ignore the bad decisions and risky actions in the recent and distant past that set the stage for a calamity of epic proportions.

CET post mortem analysis of the financial crisis identified 8 different threat cascades that were individually considered as harmless, or at-best, a nuisance. However, collectively, these cascades had exponential destructive effects.

CET has helped many companies identify and transform hidden threats and root causes into massive competitive advantages.

Success Stories

Examples of where CET techniques including gamified process analysis have been successfully applied:

  • War Game Facilitation at the Pentagon
  • Product recall mitigation for a global beverage company
  • To identify millions in savings for a Florida Hospital group
  • Bankruptcy avoidance and business transformation for an automotive dealership
  • Saved $38 million at a major Copper smelting operation
  • To avoid the cancelation of a several hundred-million-dollar contract at an electronics supplier
  • To diffuse disagreements between the owner of a large retail store and the management team
  • To develop corrective actions for a failing Lean Six Sigma program at a major Aerospace company
  • Identification of redundancies, inefficiencies and lack of communications across 24 different health plans in a health insurance company

Benefits of CET

  • Improved observational resolution and clarity
  • Identifies, assesses and reconciles the conflict between positive and negative chain reactions
  • Ability to transform cascading threats into disruptive innovations
  • Maximizes employee engagement and empowerment
  • Provides leadership with an “early-warning” system 

What’s Next

In a series of future articles in CERM Risk Insights, we will explore many facets of Cascade Effect Thinking and demonstrate how it can significantly improve and even disrupt many popular risk management and leadership paradigms.

Bio:

David Patrishkoff is President of E3 – Extreme Enterprise Efficiency® and the Founder of The Institute for Cascade Effect Research®. He is a Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt and the inventor of a Cascading Risk Management Methodology. Prior to starting his consultancy in 2001, David held many worldwide senior executive positions in the automotive and trucking industry. Author email:  David.Patrishkoff@CascadeEffects.com

Filed Under: Articles, CERM® Risk Insights, on Risk & Safety

About Greg Hutchins

Greg Hutchins PE CERM is the evangelist of Future of Quality: Risk®. He has been involved in quality since 1985 when he set up the first quality program in North America based on Mil Q 9858 for the natural gas industry. Mil Q became ISO 9001 in 1987

He is the author of more than 30 books. ISO 31000: ERM is the best-selling and highest-rated ISO risk book on Amazon (4.8 stars). Value Added Auditing (4th edition) is the first ISO risk-based auditing book.

« Magnetic Flow Meters
Leading & Lagging KPIs, What Is The Difference? »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CERM® Risk Insights series Article by Greg Hutchins, Editor and noted guest authors

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy