Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Calculation of Reliability Using the Stress Strength Interference Model

by Enrico Belmonte 6 Comments

Calculation of Reliability Using the Stress Strength Interference Model

Calculation of Reliability Using the Stress Strength Interference Model

The calculation of reliability consists of the comparison between stress and strength. If we consider stress and strength as deterministic quantities, failure occurs when the stress exceeds strength. In reality, stress and strength are stochastic variables (Figure 1a). If the two curves overlap (Figure 1b), failure may occur. Let us suppose that s and S are continuous random variables with probability density functions f(s) and f(S), respectively.

Figure 1. (a) Stress and strength distributions; (b) Overlapping of stress and strength distributions.

In what follows, the stress-strength interference model is explained according to work done by An-Min Lee  (1). Let’s have a closer look at the interference region (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Interference region between stress and strength curves.

The probability that a stress value lies in an interval of width ds is:

$$ \displaystyle \begin{equation} P[s_{0}-\frac{ds}{2}\le s\le s_{0}+\frac{ds}{2}]=f_{S}(s_{0})ds \end{equation} $$

The probability that the strength is greater than a certain stress s0 is given by:

$$ \displaystyle \begin{equation} P\left(S>s_{o}\right)=\int_{s_{o}}^{\infty}f_{s}\left(S\right)dS \end{equation} $$

The probability that the strength is greater than a certain stress s0 is given by:

$$ \displaystyle \begin{equation} fs\left(s_{o}\right)ds\ast\int_{s_{o}}^{\infty}fs\left(S\right)dS \end{equation} $$

The reliability is the probability that the strength S is greater than the stress s for all possible values of the stress s. 

$$ \displaystyle \begin{equation} R=\int_{0}^{\infty}fs\left(s\right)\left(\int_{s}^{\infty}\left(S\right)dS\right)ds \end{equation} $$

The failure probability is calculated as:

$$ \displaystyle \begin{equation} F=1-R \end{equation} $$

Alternatively, reliability is the probability that the stress s is lower than the strength S for all possible values of the strength S. 

$$ \displaystyle \begin{equation} R=\int_{0}^{\infty}fs\left(S\right)\left(\int_{0}^{S}\left(s\right)ds\right)dS \end{equation} $$

Let’s consider an example where stress and strength are normal distributed. μ and σ refer to the mean and the standard deviation respectively.

  • μstress = 50 MPa
  • σstress = 15 MPa
  • μstrength = 75 MPa
  • σstrength = 20 Mpa

According to eq. 4, the reliability R is calculated as the integral of the function $- fs\left(s\right)\left(\int_{s}^{\infty}\left(S\right)dS\right)ds -$. Since failure probability F is calculated as F = 1- R, F is calculated as the integral of $- fs\left(s\right)\left(\int_{0}^{S}fs\left(S\right)dS\right) -$. Interestingly, funreliability and freliability are not probability density functions because the area under these curves is smaller than 1. 

Figure 3

The application of eq.(4) and eq.(5) deliver the following results:

  • Failure probability: F = 0.159
  • Reliability: R = 0.841

It is worthwhile noting that the area under the failure probability curve in Figure 2a does not correspond to the interference area. I just want to remark this point since you may find a lot illustrations in the web showing the failure probability as the interference area between stress and strength curves. Figure 4 shows that the value of interference area may significantly deviate from the correct one.

Figure 4. (a) Wrong calculation of reliability based on interference area. (b) Right calculation of reliability based on stress-strength interference theory.

References

  1. Lee, An-Min. “Stress-strength interference models in reliability.” (1989). (link)
  2. Haibach E (2006) Betriebsfestigkeit – Verfahren und Daten zur Bauteilberechnung. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29364-7
  3. Reliawiki – Reliasoft. Stress-Strength Analysis – ReliaWiki

Filed Under: Articles, on Product Reliability, Reliability Competence

About Enrico Belmonte

Responsible for developing and implementing the Design for Reliability (DfR) approach at Electrolux Group. In this role, he has developed a full-scale education program called the Reliability Excellence Program to empower reliability engineers to apply the DfR approach in the company.

« Process Flowcharts for Better Business Performance
The Next Attack »

Comments

  1. Bhavesh says

    October 20, 2023 at 3:49 AM

    Understanding the delicate balance between stress and strength in materials is akin to choosing the proper phone case – it’s not just about appearances but the intricate interplay between form and function. Just as stress and strength aren’t fixed values, a perfect phone case isn’t just about style; it’s about the reliability it offers amidst daily wear and tear, much like the intricate calculations described here. Remember, the right fit ensures your phone, like a well-calculated reliability model, stays secure in every situation.
    https://acfootballcases.com/product/jordan-henderson-14-black-panzer/

    Reply
  2. Mitch F. says

    October 23, 2023 at 1:26 PM

    Enrico, thanks for this reminder that even though the distributions overlap one needs to select a ‘poor’ strength ball and a ‘high’ stress ball to get a failure. One of the bigger takeaways of this for me is that even with modest unreliability, you may have considerably more strength/stress distribution overlap than one may have thought.

    Reply
    • Enrico Belmonte says

      October 23, 2023 at 11:41 PM

      Dear Mitch,

      Thank you for your comment. Indeed it would be nice to see the relationship between interference area and reliability. I’m going to investigate it in a following post.

      Reply
  3. Kevin Walker says

    October 24, 2023 at 5:16 AM

    Thank you, Enrico. I was one of the people with the misconception that the unreliability was the interference area. This clarified it for me.

    Reply
    • Enrico Belmonte says

      October 25, 2023 at 7:47 AM

      Great! I appreciate your feedback.

      Reply
  4. Steve Wachs says

    January 29, 2024 at 1:07 AM

    I have found it useful to use the concept of the differences distribution (stress – strength) which is also normal if both the stress and strength distributions are normal. Then it’s very straight forward to simply calculate the area under this curve where the the differences distribution is negative. The math is very straightforward. Also, I like to show how simulation can be easily used to estimate the failure probability (especially if the underlying distributions are not both well described by a normal distribution.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Reliability Competence logo Photo of Enrico BelmonteArticles by Enrico Belmonte

in the Reliability Competence article series

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy