Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Binomial Cumulative Density Function

by Fred Schenkelberg 11 Comments

Binomial Cumulative Density Function

Binomial Cumulative Density Function

Last week I posted about the Binomial probability density function, and it is useful when calculating the probability of exactly x successes out of n trials given p probability of success for each trial.

Well, what happens if you want to know the probability of 2 or more successes for example?

We could use the Binomial PDF formula to determine the probability of exactly two successes, then 3, then 4, etc. up to 8 (the example last week had eight trials). And adding those provides us a probability of 2 or more success out of 8 trials.

This is tedious. It does describe the nature of the cumulative density function for the binomial distribution. It is just the sum of individual pdf calculations over the range of interest.

$$ \large\displaystyle P\left( x,n,p \right)=\sum\limits_{i=0}^{x}{\left( \begin{array}{l}n\\i\end{array} \right){{p}^{i}}{{\left( 1-p \right)}^{n-i}}}$$

Turns out to be just as tedious as first outlined. We can sometimes reduce the number of calculations by remembering the the sum of all the probabilities for each x always tallies to 1. Therefore in this case where we are interested in the probability of 2 or more successes, we can calculate the values for zero and one success, sum those and subtract from one.

The probability of exactly 0 successes is 0.1678, and for exactly one success is 0.3355. Thus,  we sum these two values and subtract from one, 1-(0.1678+0.3355) = 0.4967. Or, there is a little less than 50% probability of having 2 or more successes.

Binomial-CDF

This plot is the CDF for p=0.2 and n=8. It shows the probability of less than or equal to a specific number of successes. The value of 1 success is just a little above 50%, and it is the tally of 0.1678 + 0.3355 = 0.5033.

The tally for 2 or fewer success include the probability for exactly two success, 0.2936, thus is 0.7969. This particular CDF approaches one quickly at about four successes.


Related:

binomial probability density function (article)

OC Curve with Binomial Method (article)

Common formulas (article)

 

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Probability and Statistics for Reliability Tagged With: Binomial distribution, Statistics distributions and functions

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Binomial Probability Density Function
Degradation Hypothesis »

Comments

  1. Gary Riggs says

    March 15, 2013 at 4:47 PM

    Now add in confidence limits .
    Fred, thanks for the work. I passed!
    Gary Riggs

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      March 15, 2013 at 4:56 PM

      Hi Gary,

      Thanks for the note and congratulations on passing!

      Job well done.

      cheers,

      Fred

      PS: be sure to follow this blog and join the Linkedin CRE Preparation group to help others preparing for the exam.

      Reply
  2. Keron says

    March 15, 2013 at 6:42 PM

    Hi Fred,

    I was also successful in the CRE exams. Thanks again! I really want to apply this knowledge in the real world.

    Reply
  3. Fred Schenkelberg says

    March 15, 2013 at 6:45 PM

    Hi Keron,

    Congratulations to you!

    Let us know what you’re working on and do ask any questions about how to best approach real world problems you find.

    cheers,

    Fred

    Reply
  4. JOSE CONTRERAS says

    August 26, 2013 at 11:14 AM

    Could you give us any practical applications and examples, please? Thanks.

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      August 26, 2013 at 11:22 AM

      A simple real world issue is how many spares should I take with me to a site knowing that, say 20% of the spares are bad (and I can’t tell until it’s installed – which is a different problem to solve).

      p is 0.8 or the probability that the spare will work.

      If I only take one spare, there is a 20% chance it will fail. So, how many should I carry to be say, 95% or more certain to have a working spare with me. One way to sort this out is to calculate the binomial CDF and when the chance of at least one working out of the minimum number is at least 95% then I have the number of spares to take along.

      that is just one example, if anyone has others, please comment.

      cheers,

      Fred

      Reply
      • JOSE CONTRERAS says

        August 26, 2013 at 11:25 AM

        Thank you, Fred.

        Reply
  5. flavia awan says

    May 20, 2019 at 2:34 PM

    How could there be a pdf for binomial as binomial is a discrete distribution and pdf is associated only to continuous distributions?

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      May 20, 2019 at 4:14 PM

      Hi Flavia,

      You are right, it’s the probability mass function which serves the same view of the data as the PDF does for continuous distributions. I tend to use PDF for both, sorry for the confusion.

      Cheers,

      Fred

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ][display_form id=266][/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy