Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Bathtub Curve and Human Mortality

by Enrico Belmonte Leave a Comment

Bathtub Curve and Human Mortality

Bathtub Curve and Human Mortality

The bathtub curve is one of the most famous graphical representations in reliability. It shows the typical trend of failure rate over time (Figure 1). This curve can be divided into three parts corresponding to decreasing, constant and increasing failure rate. 

High but decreasing failure rate in the first part of the curve (1) indicates products defective or prone to fail due to manufacturing or design issues. The middle section (2) is characterized by low and constant failure rate. Failures in this phase are caused by unpredictable external events like flatting tire or power surge causing electronic failures. The right-hand side of the bathtub curve (3) shows increasing failure rate. In this stage, failures occur due to wear-out damage mechanisms such as fatigue, creep, ageing, wear and corrosion.

Figure 1. Schematic representation of the bathtub curve. The three different zones refer to 1) decreasing failure rate; 2) constant failure rate; 3) increasing failure rate.

Often, the shape of the bathtub curve is said to reproduce mortality in three main phases of human life from birth to senility: 1) infant mortality; 2) mortality related to unintentional injury like accidents; 3) mortality due to ageing-associated diseases. Failure rate of products and human mortality seem to be similar. Moreover, probably for sketching purposes, the bathtub curve is represented symmetric. After all, if you have a bathtub at home, this is most likely symmetric. 

The schematic example in Figure 1 also follows this assumption. It seems that it is somehow in the nature of things that mortality of infants is similar to that of elderly individuals. As father of three children and reliability engineer, I was concerned about that. Especially at the childbirth. According to the bathtub curve, infant mortality is highest at childbirth. Childbirth is such a critical moment in life. 

I decided to analyze the data on mortality in Italy from the Human Mortality Database (HMD) [1]. Mortality is calculated as the number of deaths each year at age “x” divided by the population at that age over the same period. Figure 2 shows mortality in the range 0-95 years in Italy in the year 2020. The color and the size of the circular markers indicate the number of deaths and the number of alive individuals for a certain year, respectively. I was relieved to note that mortality of infants is not the same as for a 80 year old person. The curve does not seem like a bathtub curve, we introduced in Figure 1. It is pretty flat until the age 70 years. After this point, the gradient of the curve increases gradually, and accelerates more rapidly from the age of 80 years.

Figure 2. Mortality over age (Country: Italy; Year: 2020; Age interval 0 – 95 years) Color: number of deaths, Size: number of alive individuals. Source: [1].

Zooming into the initial part of Figure 2, one can see that infant mortality is higher at childbirth than later (Figure 3). For infants, the risk of death is highest just after birth, but mortality is orders of magnitude lower than that of elderly individuals.

Figure 3. Mortality over age (Country: Italy; Year: 2020; Age interval 0 – 10 years). Color: number of deaths. Size: number of alive individuals. Source: [1]. 

In the past the situation was worse. Figure 4 shows that in 1872, the year when the records began, mortality at childbirth was 27.8% with 227.888 fatalities. In 2020, mortality decreases to 0.2% with 1016 fatalities (a reduction of 99.1%!). According to HMD, the quality of data for 1872-1905 is lower than in later years. However, for the purpose of this article, I want to highlight the significant improvement in terms of reduction of infant mortality over the last 150 years. Even without going so far back in time, comparing mortality at the time when I was born (1987) with present, the result is impressive. In this period, the reduction of mortality at childbirth is 78%.

Figure 4. Mortality over year (Country: Italy; Age: 0 year). Source: [1]

So, can we finally say that the bathtub curve does not reproduce human life? Only if countries invest in healthcare regardless of people’s income, race and national origin. Otherwise, terrible trends like those shown by Italy before 1900 could be observed (Figure 5). For example, in the year 1872, mortality of children was dramatically high and not just at the childbirth. It took more than 5 years to reach the plateau. 

Figure 5. Mortality over age (Country: Italy; Year: 1872; Age interval 0 – 95 years); Color: number of deaths. Size: number of alive individuals. Source: [1].

What about using the concept of the bathtub curve for modelling the failure rate of products? Is it still valid?  For new products or new production processes we might see an increase of the failure rate at the beginning of the product life due to lack of design and process optimization. Defective products are delivered to the customer who immediately calls service for replacement. Companies track early failures with specific KPIs such as the Service Call Rate (SCR). SCR indicates the number of products for which an intervention by the service was needed in a specific time range.

Comparing the mortality curves in 1872 (Fig. 5) and 2020 (Fig. 2), we can derive the main tasks for reliability engineers:

  1. Apply risk mitigation approaches such as FMEA and DRBFM in order to minimize failure rate at beginning of the product life.
  2. Minimize failure rate in the central part of the curve implementing countermeasures aimed to limit the impact of unpredictable external events on reliability. 
  3. Design the product so that the change from constant to increasing failure rate fulfills customer’s expectations.

Concluding, infant mortality can and must be minimized. Ageing can just be delayed. With these two principles in mind, we can design products lasting the time expected by the consumers without creating a lot of waste due to defective products.

[1] HMD. Human Mortality Database. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany), University of California, Berkeley (USA), and French Institute for Demographic Studies (France). Available at www.mortality.org (data downloaded on 12/11/2023).

Filed Under: Articles, on Product Reliability, Reliability Competence

About Enrico Belmonte

Responsible for developing and implementing the Design for Reliability (DfR) approach at Electrolux Group. In this role, he has developed a full-scale education program called the Reliability Excellence Program to empower reliability engineers to apply the DfR approach in the company.

« Crazy Risk Management with a Risk Matrix
Evaluating Equipment Overhauls – are they Really Worth it? »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Reliability Competence logo Photo of Enrico BelmonteArticles by Enrico Belmonte

in the Reliability Competence article series

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy