Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Basics of Affinity Diagrams

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Basics of Affinity Diagrams

Basics of Affinity Diagrams

When you have a scattering of ideas or suggestions, you can use affinity diagrams to organize and group them.

Affinity diagraming is a simple way for an individual or (better) a group to quickly gather and organize a large number of disparate concepts, ideas, suggestions, etc. It is a natural activity after a brainstorming session.

Affinity Diagram Procedure

With one two steps, this procedure is easy to remember.

First, without talking (more on this in a moment), sort the ideas into groups.

Second, for each group of ideas create a summary title the represents that group.

That’s it.

Let’s say you have 200 stickies each with one idea from the brainstorming session. Some are word-for-word the same idea. Some are the same idea only worded slightly differently. Some are really different than others.

The first step includes the no talking rule. When just finishing a brainstorming session where the team is quickly generating ideas and withholding comments, this next step becomes very difficult for most teams.

The idea with no talking is to further reduce the urge to comment, lobby, cajole, or critique ideas toward being the one taking forward in the analysis.

The power of affinity diagraming with a group is getting the groups consensus around the major groups of ideas that require further action and consideration.

Not talking is difficult and requires a facilitator to remind the team to remain silent.

As the grouping occurs, individuals, using their own scheme of grouping and building on other apparent schemes, moves stickies to clusters. Create some space around different groups.

This process may take 5 to 10 minutes. As the movement slows down, that is the signal that the groupings are good enough.

The grouping automatically clusters of similar or repeated ideas generated during the brainstorming. It also bundles ideas that are similar.

For example, if brainstorming how a sensor system might fail, the team may suggest:

  • poor solder joints
  • external damage to circuit board
  • faulty components
  • corrosion
  • high temperature exposure

This short list could be grouped a number of ways, yet let’s say the team created two groups one that includes the internal to the electronics (solder joints and components) and another that is due to external stresses (damage, corrosion, temperature). You might label these two groups as Failures in circuit board design and assembly and the second group as Failures due to external stresses.

The idea is to summarize the items grouped together. This effectively reduces the number of topics carried forward in your analysis. Instead of dealing with 200 ideas you most likely narrow the list down to 10 or so groups of ideas for further analysis.

Best Practices for Affinity Diagraming

Just a couple of notes when conducting an affinity diagraming session:

  • During brainstorming write one idea per stickie.
  • At the end of the brainstorming, place all the stickie notes on a wall or across a table.
  • Remind the team that this is an ‘out of chair’ experience. Everyone should be involved and encouraged to move the ideas into groups of their own design.
  • No talking when sorting and organizing. (may require reminders). Provide positive reinforcement and keep the activity light and fun.
  • No rules or suggestions on how to group the ideas.
  • If a stickie is moved to one group only to be moved back by someone else. Make a copy of the idea on a new stickie and place in both groups.
  • A wall works well and caution tall folks not to create groups at the upper range of their reach.
  • As the sorting and movement of stickies slows, prompt the group that there is one minute left for final moves.
  • Keep all the ideas with the newly names group. This preserves the individual ideas incase a review of what is included is necessary.

Summary

Just try it next time you have a bunch of ideas to organize. It’s fun, quick, and efficient.

Just two steps. Organize ideas in to groups and add a group label. The hard part is not talking during sorting, yet it does provide the best results.

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Reliability Management

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« I Guess I’m a Bit of a Running Shoe Designer
Risk Based Problem Solving and Decision Making »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ][display_form id=266][/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy