
In the analysis of repairable equipment, one may need to make the assumption of constant failure rate. In my opinion, anytime one wants to make the assumption of constant failure rate, it should be validated. [Read more…]
Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site
Author of CRE Preparation Notes, Musings", NoMTBF, multiple books & ebooks>, co-host on Speaking of Reliability>/a>, and speaker in the Accendo Reliability Webinar Series.
This author's archive lists contributions of articles and episodes.
by Fred Schenkelberg 7 Comments
In the analysis of repairable equipment, one may need to make the assumption of constant failure rate. In my opinion, anytime one wants to make the assumption of constant failure rate, it should be validated. [Read more…]
by Fred Schenkelberg 4 Comments
An error that I see on occasion is the use of statistical confidence with a goal or target value. For example, we want 95% reliability at five years with 90% confidence. What does that mean? [Read more…]
by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment
Hypothesis testing permits us to compare two groups of items and determine if there is a significant difference or not. There are many types of hypothesis tests depending on the specific question, type of data, and what is or is not known when designing the test. [Read more…]
by Fred Schenkelberg 1 Comment
The document by Nowlan and Heap
Part of keeping equipment operational is affecting repairs appropriately. Sometimes it makes sense to replace an element of some equipment before it fails, i.e. automobile tires as the tread wears. Sometimes is doesn’t make sense to repair a functioning unit as the result would be a system that is less reliable then before. [Read more…]
by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment
As we continue to find and improve ways to master our environment, accomplish tasks, communicate, move, heal, etc. we continue to discover new materials, processes, and products. Emerging technologies often promise
They also may last longer.
As a minimum, they should last long as current solutions or longer or provide another compelling reason to use the new technology. [Read more…]
by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment
The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2012 annual report for this blog.
Here’s an excerpt:
600 people reached the top of Mt. Everest in 2012. This blog got about 11,000 views in 2012. If every person who reached the top of Mt. Everest viewed this blog, it would have taken 18 years to get that many views.
by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment
Once again those with a CRE are at or near the top of the salaries reported in this survey. See more at http://www.qualityprogress.com/salarysurvey
by Fred Schenkelberg 16 Comments
I never did like taking final exams in college as I viewed them as four hours I would rather spend doing something (anything) else. An exam is a check of what you know about a topic or subject. We prepared for those exams by reading, studying, practicing working problems (doing homework) and trying to understand the key concepts, trends, themes, etc. Some of my classmates thought it was about how much they could stuff into short term memory, others though sleep deprivation had something to do with preparing for an exam. [Read more…]
by Fred Schenkelberg 5 Comments
Just a couple of sample questions from deep in the body of knowledge this week.
Which of the following can be evaluated with dye penetrant methods? [Read more…]
by Fred Schenkelberg 5 Comments
Hi all,
I’m asking for feedback here. I’m thinking about building a subscription service that sends the subscriber a CRE preparation question a day (maybe adjustable by subscriber … not sure how to do this yet). [Read more…]
by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment
Kirk Gray, Accelerated Reliability Solutions, L.L.C.
It is easy to understand why the term HALT (Highly Accelerated Life Test) is so tightly couple to the equipment called “HALT chambers” systems. Many do not think they can do HALT processes without a “HALT Chamber”. Many know that Dr. Gregg Hobbs, who coined the term HALT and also HASS (Highly Accelerated Stress Screens), spent much of his life promoting the techniques and was also the founder of two “HALT/HASS” environmental chamber companies. [Read more…]
by Fred Schenkelberg 2 Comments
Let’s work a sample size problem.
A random sample size, n, is to be taken from a large population having a standard deviation of 1″. The sample size is to be determined so that there well be a 0.05 risk probability of exceeding a 0.1″ tolerance error in using the sample mean to estimate μ. Which of the following values is nearest the required sample size?
a. 42
b. 106
c. 203
d. 384 [Read more…]
by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment
I recently received a question concerning what sample size to use when assessing call center calls. Not a lot of information in the request, so my answer was rather general. And, thought it might provide some insight to others facing sample size questions of their own. [Read more…]
by Fred Schenkelberg 11 Comments
note: if you know of a great online resource that isn’t on this list, please add a comments and we’ll add it to the list for all to share.
Shon Isenhour recently posted on Linkedin a question about online resources helpful for reliability engineers. I added my list and hadn’t seen any other links added. There must be more than the few I know about – what can you add to this list? [Read more…]
by Fred Schenkelberg 3 Comments
Ran across an interesting graphic in a new book recently. It single-handedly placed dependability in its proper context. It is an umbrella term that includes most of what we commonly think of as reliability and the other ‘ilities.’ It encompasses the various connotations of dependable and reliable that are conveyed during common use. And, the term dependability permits the overarching context for defining very clearly the various [Read more…]