Two Approaches
Abstract
Chris and Fred use the safe return of the Boeing Starliner … without the crew! What does this tell us about its safety and reliability?
ᐅ Play Episode
Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site
Author of Reliability in Emerging Technology, multiple books, co-host on Speaking of Reliability, and speaker in the Accendo Reliability Webinar Series.
This author's archive lists contributions of articles and episodes.
Chris is a reliability engineering teacher ... which means that after working with many organizations to make lasting cultural changes, he is now focusing on developing online, avatar-based courses that will hopefully make the 'complex' art of reliability engineering into a simple, understandable activity that you feel confident of doing (and understanding what you are doing).
by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment
Chris and Fred use the safe return of the Boeing Starliner … without the crew! What does this tell us about its safety and reliability?
ᐅ Play Episode
by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment
Chris and Fred discuss the issues we often have with ‘habits.’ Habits can be good for us. But ‘bad habits’ are just that. Ever heard the excuse ‘but that’s the way we have always done it?’
ᐅ Play Episode
by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment
Chris and Fred discuss reliability engineering … and vacations/holidays! … how are we going to make this topic relevant …
ᐅ Play Episode
by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment
Chris and Fred discuss how to calculate ‘confidence’ and other things regarding probability and statistics … particularly as it applies to reliability!
ᐅ Play Episode
by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment
And the answer is not ‘the letter C.’ A FMEA is a group activity that follows a logical (and time-proven) structure to effectively ‘brainstorm’ what are called ‘corrective actions’ for existing or likely problems in design and manufacture of products. Production teams that comprise designers, engineers, technicians and manufacturers typically have a wealth of existing knowledge and understanding of the product being developed. But some people will tell you that an FMECA is not an FMEA. And many government agencies, in particular, demand FMECAs over FMEAs. Interested to understand the difference (if any) between FMEAs and FMECAs? … and How can you make an FMECA work for you? Join us at this webinar!
[Read more…]
by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment
Chris and Fred discuss the ability to get ‘data sets’ to practice reliability analysis on! … sounds like a party …
ᐅ Play Episode
by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment
Chris and Fred discuss how long stuff lasts! … or how long something should last! … how do you ‘know’ what it should be?
ᐅ Play Episode
by Christopher Jackson 2 Comments
Chris and Fred discuss how reliability can sometimes be linked to politics (… at least in some way). Is this an experience you share?
ᐅ Play Episode
by Christopher Jackson 4 Comments
There might not ever be a better demonstration of the saying that …
… a fish rots from it’s head.
Boeing is responsible for the half-baked Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS) that was forced into its new 737 Max aircraft. This involved a decidedly awful attempt to convince the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) that there was no need to subject said aircraft through all the checks and balances that you need to go through if it is in fact a brand-new and different type of plane. Which it was. This resulted in the deaths of 346 passengers and crew (along with plenty of claims that it was pilot error). And just to be clear, Boeing has since admitted that it’s employees defrauded the FAA during the original certification process – an admission it was not required to make if it was able to complete a three-year period of increased monitoring and reporting. Which it could not.
[Read more…]by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment
Chris and Fred discuss how to make a good impression when interviewing for a reliability engineering position. How do you prepare?
ᐅ Play Episode
by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment
What is a ‘root cause’ of failure? It is something that you did (or didn’t) do that ultimately resulted in failure. It’s not corrosion (that’s a physical process that follows the laws of nature that you can’t change). It’s not a porous seal that allows moisture to enter your product to cause corrosion (that’s a defect or fault that you or your team made happen). Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is the process where we systematically work out what things we did or didn’t do that allowed failure to occur, and Fault Trees are often very helpful in finding this root causes. If you want to learn more about RCA or how fault trees can help RCA, join us for this webinar.
[Read more…]
by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment
A simple way of looking at our brain is by dividing it into the conscious, subconscious and unconscious minds. The conscious mind is all about what we are actively thinking about in the here and now. We might be navigating as we drive through the countryside. We might decide to take an exit from the main road because our conscious mind has worked out that the map we are looking at is showing us that’s what we need to do to get to where we want to go.
by Christopher Jackson 2 Comments
Past Good and Bad Knowledge
Chris and Fred discuss the so-called ‘bedrock documents and statistics’ that are used over and over again as if they are universally correct – even though they might have nothing to do with ‘your’ machines or systems. WHY?
ᐅ Play Episode
by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment
When I was a bright eyed, motivated (younger) officer in the Australian Army, one my many tasks when deployed overseas was to raise paperwork to formally request ‘battlefield material’ to be sent back home from whatever country we were in. ‘Battlefield material’ was items that included a range of mementos, keepsakes, and things you would typically see in a museum to add to the historical collections of my battalions and regiments back home.
by Christopher Jackson 4 Comments
Chris and Fred discuss the three-letter acronym ‘MLE’ stands for? Well, it stands for ‘maximum likelihood estimate.’ Ever heard of it? Do you know what it means?
ᐅ Play Episode