Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / 4 Signs That Show Your Asset Reliability Program Is Outdated

by Bryan Christiansen Leave a Comment

4 Signs That Show Your Asset Reliability Program Is Outdated

4 Signs That Show Your Asset Reliability Program Is Outdated

Asset reliability programs are a set of initiatives for tracking the health, effectiveness and locations of both fixed and moveable assets. It involves routine maintenance, as well as the collection and analysis of equipment operating data to measure efficiency throughout their useful lives. 

A good reliability engineering program provides insight on the frequency of asset failures, cost of operation, maintenance and repair, and the quality of maintenance work. Over time, an organization needs to evaluate metrics such as mean time between failures (MTBF), mean time to repair (MTTR), and mean time to failure (MTTF) to ascertain the suitability of the selected maintenance strategy.

Companies have access to several digital tools for tracking and enhancing the visibility of assets, managing real-time collection and analysis of maintenance data, and streamlining asset management workflows. When establishing asset reliability programs, companies must provide measures for future upgrades. The addition of new assets or advances in technology renders these programs obsolete. An outdated asset reliability program leads to poor asset management, with negative impacts on the profitability and efficiency of operations. Which signs indicate that the asset reliability program in place is obsolete?

1. A Spike in Emergency Maintenance Work

Equipment maintenance is at the heart of asset reliability programs. Preventive or routine maintenance activities have been the preferred choice for most organizations. Maintenance teams perform activities such as lubrication, cleaning, or scheduled replacement of components to prevent asset failures. The company establishes a robust plan that distributes workloads within specific schedules. 

An increase in instances of emergency breakdowns could indicate that:

  • The program is no longer viable for the facility since there is an increase in assets, with no changes to maintenance schedules.
  • The choice of preventive maintenance activities is ineffective and cannot prevent failures. 

An increase in emergency repair work reduces the quality of maintenance work and exposes technicians to health risks due to longer working hours. Companies can avoid these issues by digitizing maintenance workflows using Computerized Maintenance Management Systems (CMMS). They provide tools for continuously updating asset registries for every new acquisition.

2. Increased Safety Incidents

Organizations rely on asset reliability programs to enhance the safety standards of facilities, operations, and production equipment. Employees feel confident when executing their duties in safe facilities, free from hazardous energy, emissions, and machinery-related accidents. Reliability programs have provisions for machine-specific lockout tagout procedures, essential emergency procedures, allocation, and the proper use of protective equipment.

With time, a reliability program may begin failing. Asset malfunctioning becomes rampant, exposing facility occupants and equipment operators to workplace injuries and accidents. A failure to update standard operating procedures along with the introduction of new or advanced assets means that existing safety procedures, LOTO guidelines, and safety signages become inapplicable. 

Minimizing safety incidents due to aging equipment or obsolescence of reliability programs requires investment in the appropriate condition monitoring technology. Proper implementation of CMMS programs helps the company to effectively track assets, update and then communicate changes to standard operating procedures to employees.

3. Rising Maintenance, Repair and Operations Costs

An effective reliability program outlines a long-term maintenance and operations plan for the company. It quantifies budgets and schedules for minor and major maintenance interventions, tool and spare parts’ requisition. It also defines the appropriate types of spare parts to use on specific equipment.

An outdated asset reliability program over-stretches the company’s maintenance, repair and operations costs. The proactive maintenance activities become insufficient, leading to frequent failures and unplanned replacement of critical components. Companies may opt for sub-standard generic spare parts to bridge the demand for asset repair consumables. 

Though it may be an immediate financial remedy, low-quality spare parts reduce the efficiency of assets and increase operational risks. The company has to spend more money to pay wages for technicians who repair equipment during emergency breakdowns. 

Companies can control MRO budgets by proactively reviewing their asset reliability programs, embracing CMMS solutions, auditing assets to identify aging/obsolete ones, and performing a comprehensive root cause analysis of common asset failures.

4. Increased Process Downtime

The goal of a reliability program is to guarantee the availability and efficiency of physical assets throughout the production processes. Companies use reliability metrics to formulate production plans and streamline supply chains. These facilities rely on asset utilization metrics to quantify production and estimate profit margins. 

When a reliability program can no longer meet its objectives, the probability of machine failures increases. Companies spend more time repairing defective assets than on their full-scale production. The failure to implement appropriate maintenance interventions increases the number of ghost assets. They occupy space and appear in asset management records, yet they cannot provide value to the company. In the end, the cost of repairs exceeds the returns.

Companies can reduce production downtime by investing in data-driven proactive asset management strategies. They can plan for production and maintenance using accurate data and reorganize their supply chains accordingly. 

Final Remarks

An outdated asset management program throws companies out of business in a heartbeat. The current business environment is dynamic and competitive. Companies need to be proactive in all elements of their business. They must frequently review their asset reliability programs, focus on continuous improvements and embrace the appropriate technological solutions.

Filed Under: Articles, CMMS and Reliability, on Maintenance Reliability Tagged With: Asset management, Reliability program

About Bryan Christiansen

Bryan Christiansen is the founder and CEO at Limble CMMS. Limble is a modern, easy to use mobile CMMS software that takes the stress and chaos out of maintenance by helping managers organize, automate, and streamline their maintenance operations. While his primary experience is in software engineering, developing Limble required him to gain a deep understanding of the maintenance industry.

« Facility Maintenance Software: 5 Benefits of Barcoding Technology
Surviving the Recovery – part 1 »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Bryan Christiansen
in the CMMS and Reliability series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy