Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Facilitation Skill # 4 – Asking Thought-starter Questions

by Carl S. Carlson Leave a Comment

Facilitation Skill # 4 – Asking Thought-starter Questions

Facilitation Skill # 4 – Asking Thought-starter Questions

“A thought, even a possibility, can shatter and transform us.” – Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche

One of my favorite FMEA facilitation techniques, and one that can significantly enhance meaningful participation from FMEA team members, is called “Asking Thought-starter Questions.”

Merriam-Webster defines “thought” as “the action of process of thinking” and “starter” as “something that is the beginning of a process or activity.”

What are thought-starter questions?

Thought-starter questions are designed to stimulate thinking in the team. Specifically, for each FMEA element, like function, failure mode, effect, etc., the purpose of thought-starter questions is to get the team thinking constructively about that specific element.

What are examples of thought-starter questions in a Design FMEA?

I’ll use a simple example of a Design FMEA on a bicycle brake cable to illustrate this technique. Click Excerpt from All-Terrain Brake Cable Design FMEA to see an excerpt from a fictitious FMEA on brake cable.

Function

In a Design FMEA, a function is what the item is intended to do, usually to a given standard of performance or requirement. The DFMEA focuses on the primary functions.

To use thought-starter questions to determine a function for a bicycle brake cable, rather than saying, “what is the function?” try asking, “what is the purpose of the bicycle brake cable? What is it intended to do?” This will get better discussion and does not require the FMEA team to be experts in FMEA definitions. 

Failure Mode

Failure mode in a DFMEA is how the item fails to deliver the intended function and its associated requirements.

If one of the intended functions of a brake cable is “to provide adjustable and calibrated movement between the brake lever and brake caliper,” how should the facilitator ask for failure mode?

Should the facilitator say, “What is the failure mode?” In my experience, this is not the best way to stimulate the right thinking. First, the question presupposes the team understands very well the definition of failure mode. It is better to say, “what is the manner in which the brake cable will not provide adjustable and calibrated movement between the lever and the caliper?” Or, “what could go wrong with the brake cable when it is providing its primary function?” There are countless ways to ask the question, but the key is to elicit discussion around the concept being addressed. This bypasses the need for the team member to understand the definition fully, and goes straight to the concept of the way the cable might fail, and the mode of the failure.

Effect

In a DFMEA, effect is the consequence of the failure taken to the system or end user. It can be a progression at local level, followed by the next level up to the system or end user. However, in all cases, the team does its best job to describe the consequence at the system or end-use level.

Let’s say one of the failure modes is “cable breaks.” How should the FMEA facilitator ask for the effect of this failure mode?

Should the facilitator ask, “what is the effect?” Again, this is not the best way to bring about the right discussion. It would be better to ask, “if the cable breaks, what is the consequence to the bicycle or the rider?” Or, “what could possibly happen when the cable breaks locally and tracing up to the bicycle and rider?”

Cause

Cause in a Design FMEA is the reason for the failure mode, expressed as a potential design deficiency.

For the failure mode “cable breaks,” the facilitator might ask, “why does the cable break?” or “what potential design deficiency would explain the cable breaking?” Or any other variation that explores the concept of the cause.

What are examples of thought-starter questions in Process FMEA?

To illustrate this technique, I’ll use a simple example of a Process FMEA on one of the steps for assembling a bicycle wheel; specifically “Wheel spoke installation.” Click Excerpt from wheel-spoke installation PFMEA to see an excerpt from a fictitious FMEA on wheel spoke installation for a front wheel assembly.

Function (Operation Description)

In a process FMEA, function, or operation description is what the process step is intended to do, usually to a given standard of performance or requirement. Rather than ask the team for a function, you could say, “what is the purpose of the wheel spoke installation process step?” It might be “Orient and place 36 wheel spokes properly in wheel assembly fixture.”

Failure Mode

To ask for a failure mode in the bicycle wheel spoke example, you might ask, “How could the wheel spokes be installed incorrectly?” or “What could go wrong with placing the wheel spokes in the assembly fixture?”

Effect

Similarly, when discussing effects, you could ask, “If there are too few spokes placed in the wheel assembly fixture, what is the consequence to the next operation or the assembly line?” Or “What happens to the bicycle assembly if there are too few spokes placed in the wheel assembly fixture? How does it get remedied?”

Cause

When discussing the cause, you could ask, “what about the bicycle assembly process might be a reason we end up with too few spokes?” Or “What process deficiency might explain why we could have too few spokes?”

Summarizing

When using thought-starter questions, each element of the FMEA is discussed by asking questions that align with the fundamental concepts of the FMEA element rather than merely referring the column heading. Other facilitation skills are also used to elicit deep discussion with the team. Sure, you could say, “what’s the cause?” But you get better results by asking, “what is a potential design deficiency that would result in the failure mode?” Or any variation that is faithful to the concept being discussed.

Thought-starter questions are only just that . . . thought starters and are not meant to limit in any way the skill of the FMEA facilitator and team in establishing the content of the FMEA. They are intended to get the team thinking about the right concepts.

Tips

Thought-starter questions are not rote. They are not canned. Nothing takes the place of fully understanding the FMEA definitions and concepts. If you want to apply thought-starter questions, the best way is to practice, practice, practice the definitions and concepts of FMEA, and use that understanding to craft meaningful questions and fully engage the team.

Next Article

The next article in the FMEA Facilitation series is called Active Listening. Understanding what another person is saying and why they are saying it is key to meaningful and productive discussions.

[display_form id=415]

Filed Under: Articles, Inside FMEA, on Tools & Techniques

About Carl S. Carlson

Carl S. Carlson is a consultant and instructor in the areas of FMEA, reliability program planning and other reliability engineering disciplines, supporting over one hundred clients from a wide cross-section of industries. He has 35 years of experience in reliability testing, engineering, and management positions, including senior consultant with ReliaSoft Corporation, and senior manager for the Advanced Reliability Group at General Motors.

« Pay $3k to Keep out of Trouble, or More to Get out of Jail
Hey, Maintenance Planner! Do You Know What to Report on in Weekly Meetings? »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Carl Carlson
in the Inside FMEA series

[popup type="" link_text="Logo Info" ]

Information about FMEA Icon

Inside FMEA can be visually represented by a large tree, with roots, a solid trunk, branches, and leaves.

- The roots of the tree represent the philosophy and guiding principles for effective FMEAs.
- The solid trunk of the tree represents the fundamentals for all FMEAs.
- The branches represent the various FMEA applications.
- The leaves represent the valuable outcomes of FMEAs.
- This is intended to convey that each of the various FMEA applications have the same fundamentals and philosophical roots.

 

For example, the roots of the tree can represent following philosophy and guiding principles for effective FMEAs, such as:

1. Correct procedure         2. Lessons learned
3. Trained team                 4. Focus on prevention
5. Integrated with DFR    6. Skilled facilitation
7. Management support

The tree trunk represents the fundamentals of FMEA. All types of FMEA share common fundamentals, and these are essential to successful FMEA applications.

The tree branches can include the different types of FMEAs, including:

1. System FMEA         2. Design FMEA
3. Process FMEA        4. DRBFM
5. Hazard Analysis     6. RCM or Maintenance FMEA
7. Software FMEA      8. Other types of FMEA

The leaves of the tree branches represent individual FMEA projects, with a wide variety of FMEA scopes and results. [/popup]

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy