Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / 8 Common Pitfalls to Avoid When Implementing an EAM System

by Alex Williams Leave a Comment

8 Common Pitfalls to Avoid When Implementing an EAM System

8 Common Pitfalls to Avoid When Implementing an EAM System

Upwards of 95% of all EAM software implementations fail to deliver the desired results. The underlying cause of most EAM failures can be traced back to the early stages of the implementation process. Implementation activities often cost organizations more than the software itself, so it makes sense to learn about concepts and practices that can help prevent implementation failure. It’s important to maximize your chance of success when implementing facility maintenance software in your organization. Avoid these 8 common pitfalls when implementing EAM software:

1. Failing to understand the true cost of fully implementing EAM software

EAM vendors that want to win your business will try to provide you with the most competitive bids possible. They might be reluctant to reveal implementation costs upfront for fear that they won’t be chosen for the sale. The practice of hiding the full costs of implementation isn’t uncommon in the maintenance software industry because many EAM software vendors are more interested in selling their software than fixing an organization’s problems. Be sure to select a vendor that not only offers competitively priced software but that also works closely with you to align your organization’s processes with their software’s functionality.

 2.     Not clearly defining requirements

An organization will struggle to achieve its facility maintenance software objectives on time and on budget if it doesn’t create a thorough implementation plan that clearly defines realistic goals, expectations, and timelines.

3.     Not having a skilled implementation team

In order to bridge the gap between your organization’s current processes and the processes required to successfully use your EAM software, you need to assemble a skilled implementation team. You could use a trained internal team, if available, or hire your vendor to guide you through all phases of the implementation process.

4.     Selecting the wrong EAM system

In some instances, implementation failures stem from the selection process. When choosing EAM software, it is important to identify your organization’s true requirements by listening to end users and then evaluating software against them. Avoid software that would require a high level of customization or tailoring to meet your needs.

5.     Being swayed by unnecessary bells and whistles

Many EAM systems are rich in functionality, and organizations may be easily swayed by bells and whistles that they don’t truly need. Think through your priorities and choose facility maintenance software that has the functionalities most important for your organization and environment.

6.     Not getting complete management buy-in

Maintenance managers stand to benefit greatly from the implementation of EAM software, but prior to launch and in the early stages of the implementation process, an EAM will require a lot of time on the maintenance manager’s part. Maintenance managers must allocate time and resources to EAM implementation, getting the system up and running while still fulfilling their regular duties. Maintenance managers are also responsible for re-engineering processes and supporting maintenance technicians through training. Therefore, it is essential to get complete management buy-in from the beginning.

7.     Not bringing maintenance workers on board

When it comes to implementing EAM software, maintenance managers can’t go it alone. Maintenance workers also need to buy into the idea of making the EAM system work and understand that the software will make their lives easier. If maintenance technicians perceive the EAM software to be complex and difficult to use, they will be reluctant to cooperate and your organization will struggle to achieve the desired results from implementation.

8.     Providing limited training

One of the most common causes of EAM implementation failure is a lack of training. In addition to organizing training during the implementation process, provide ongoing training as new features are added and new people join the team. Training outlines best practices for data entry and increases user adoption.

Since 1986, DPSI has implemented facility maintenance software for over 50,000 users around the world. Made for maintenance people, by maintenance people, our EAM systems are easy for maintenance personnel to understand and use. Our clients have included colleges and universities, hospitals, and commercial facilities in multiple industries. Contact us to learn more about implementing EAM software.

Filed Under: Articles, EAM & CMMS, on Maintenance Reliability

About Alex Williams

Alex Williams is the Director of Sales and Professional Services at DPSI, an industry-leading provider of computerized maintenance management systems (CMMS) and enterprise asset management (EAM) software.

« The Benefits of Proactive Maintenance
Ensuring a Clean and Well Functioning CMMS »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Alex Williams
in the EAM & CMMS series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy