Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / 5 Reasons Rate of Change is Important

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

5 Reasons Rate of Change is Important

5 Reasons Rate of Change is Important

A simplifying assumption associated with using MTTF or MTBF implies a constant hazard rate. Some assume we’re in the useful life section of the bathtub curve. Others do not understand what assumptions they are making.

Using MTTF or MTBF has many problems and as regular reader here know, we should avoid using these metrics.

By using MTTF or MTBF we also lose information. We are unable to measure or track the rate of change of our equipment or system’s failure rates (hazard rate). The simple average is just an average and does not contain the essential information we need to make decisions.

Let’s explore five different reasons the rate of change of a failure rate is important to measure and track.

1.  Clues About the Nature of the Failure Mechanism

A decreasing failure rate tends to indicate problems with manufacturing, assembly, transportation, or installation. An increasing failure rate tends to indicate wear-out-type problems.

Both patterns can occur at any time. Thus, good failure analysis of units that have failed is still important.

2.   Identify Necessary Spare Part Stocking Accurately

A decreasing failure rate would indicate a reduced need for spares in the future, while an increasing failure rate would indicate an increased need for spares in the future.

Simply maintaining stocking levels based on previous counts of failures may over or under stock expensive or critical spares.

3.  Determine Priorities for Improvements

If there are two elements of the product both showing an increasing failure rate, which do you address first? The one increasing at a faster rate, right? Another consideration is the severity of consequences of a failure and magnitude of failures. Yet when all else is even the one with a higher rate of increase should receive your attention first.

4.  Identify Potential Major Field Issues Sooner

When tracking field failures, a common outcome of the analysis is to spot potentially epidemic or higher than expected number of fairies. By monitoring the rate of failure occurrences, one can spot those increasing failure rates. An increasing failure rate, even if with just a few actual failures permits your team to investigate and understand the failure mechanism.

Finding major problems well before they become major is a good thing.

5.  Effectively Conduct Predictive Maintenance or Prognostic Health Management

Using just an average failure rate provides little insight into what will actually occur tomorrow. If the goal is to repair or replace items just before they have an unacceptable chance of failing (or just before failure occurs), we need to understand the rate of change for the probability of failure.

We can use the combination of our understanding of the failure mechanisms and existing time to failrue data (or degradation measurements) to forecast when the best time for repair/replacement.

Summary

Let your data tell the story around the changing change of failure over time. It happens. It is very rare that an item or system has a constant failure rate – thus you need to monitor the changing failure rates to make better decisions, save money and time, plus improve the reliability of your system.

Filed Under: Articles, NoMTBF Tagged With: Failure Rate

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Preventive maintenance
Power-law vs. Exponential Acceleration Models »

Comments

  1. Gerald Taranto says

    October 11, 2017 at 11:07 PM

    Hi Fred,

    Useful points as always. Especially with respect to preventing “epidemic or higher than expected number of fairies”. 🙂 Always a concern.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The NoMTBF logo

Devoted to the eradication of the misuse of MTBF.

Photo of Fred SchenkelbergArticles by Fred Schenkelberg and guest authors

in the NoMTBF article series

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy