Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / A 2-Step Process to Improve Plant Performance

by James Kovacevic Leave a Comment

A 2-Step Process to Improve Plant Performance

A 2-Step Process to Improve Plant Performance

A Simple Q&A Can Reap Improved Performance in Any Activity in Maintenance.

A failure has just occurred on a critical asset in your facility.  The result was 2 hours of lost production, but it could have been worse.  The last time that the equipment failure occurred it took 5 hours to repair.  Why was the failure repaired in less than half the time than the previous occurrence?  How can we ensure that we learn from this failure and the team’s performance to improve the plant performance?

I remember reading about a simple philosophy quite a few years ago (although I can’t remember who stated it, so I apologize that I cannot provide a reference), about a simple analysis that can be applied to any maintenance activity to improve performance.  This analysis is call the 2 Up / 2 Down analysis.

The 2 Up / 2 Down analysis is quite simple and involves asking two questions.

What Did We Do Well and Need to Sustain?

Many people focus on their weaknesses, but why focus all your energy on weakness?  Much more can be accomplished by focusing on the strengths. By taking the time to focus on what you and / or your team has done well, you can drive significant improvements.

After an event has taken place, gather the team and start asking what went well.  During a significant failure, this may be difficult, but continue to push for what went well.  After everyone has provided their input, determine the 2 activities that were completed and need to be sustained during a similar event.  Dive into why they went well and what needs to be done to sustain them.

To sustain activities, checklists can be implemented, staging of materials, tools can take place, or the upskilling of staff.

A side benefit of this activity is that the team is taking a bit of time to reflect on their strengths and successes.  It is easy to get caught up in the rat race and focus on what went wrong, but by talking about the benefits and success, the team moral and outlook will start to improve.

What Did We Do Poorly and Need to Improve?

Everyone likes to focus on their weaknesses, but that should only consume part of our time.  The second step is identifying what activities did not go well during the event.  With the activities identified, have an open conversation with the team to identify why these activities did not go well.

This is not a blame session, but a constructive discussion to identify what happened and what needs to be improved.  For Shutdowns, it could be how to reduce the total shutdown time, or during failures, how the MTTR could be reduced.

Identify the Top 2 issues that need to be improved and brainstorm what can be done to improve it.  Use the team to develop the action plan and implement the actions.  These actions could include equipment standardization, checklist implementation, pre-kitted parts, etc.

Sometimes there is a debate about whether to do the positive actions firsts or the negative actions.  I prefer to do the positive actions first as it energizes the team and gets the creative juices flowing.  It helps with engagement and brainstorming when looking at the negatives.

Putting The Answers into Action

The entire exercise and analysis would be for nothing if the results are not used.  That’s why it is vital to the success and improvement of the organization to use the analysis and implement the actions.  All actions coming out of the analysis should be put into an action log and tracked to completion.

This 2 Up / 2 Down analysis can be used on all different maintenance activities (or any activities for that matter), so make sure to implement it.  Use the analysis for failure responses, shutdowns, maintenance windows, anything and watch you plant and department performance improve.

Do you use the 2 Up / 2 Down analysis, or something similar?  What have you implemented with the analysis to sustain it and ensure the actions are completed?  What results have you seen since implementing a system such as this?

Remember, to find success, you must first solve the problem, then achieve the implementation of the solution, and finally sustain winning results.

I’m James Kovacevic
Eruditio, LLC
Where Education Meets Application

Follow @ReliableJames
Follow @EruditioLLC
Follow @HPReliability

 

References & Related Materials:
Facilitation Skills Training

Filed Under: Articles, Maintenance and Reliability, on Maintenance Reliability Tagged With: Defect elimination, Reliability program

About James Kovacevic

James is a trainer, speaker, and consultant that specializes in bringing profitability, productivity, availability, and sustainability to manufacturers around the globe.

Through his career, James has made it his personal mission to make industry a profitable place; where individuals and manufacturers possess the resources, knowledge, and courage to sustainably lower their operating costs.

« The Project Approval Committee
Equipment Reliability Depends On Understanding Failure Modes! »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Maintenance & Reliability series


by James Kovacevic

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy