Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / The 2 Parameter Binomial Discrete Distribution 4 Formulas

by Fred Schenkelberg 1 Comment

The 2 Parameter Binomial Discrete Distribution 4 Formulas

The 2 Parameter Binomial Discrete Distribution 4 Formulas

This is part of a short series on the common life data distributions.

The Binomial distribution is discrete. This short article focuses on 4 formulas of the Binomial Distribution.

It has the essential formulas that you may find useful when answering specific questions. Knowing a distribution’s set of parameters does provide, along with the right formulas, a quick means to answer a wide range of reliability related questions.

Assumptions

Given a count variable and if the following conditions apply then the binomial distribution is rather useful.

  1. There a fixed number, n, of observations
  2. The observations are independent
  3. The outcome of each observation is either success or failure
  4. The probability of success, p, is the same for each observation

The binomial distribution describes the count variable which is the result of n Bernoulli trials. The occurrence of successes are not ordered thus may occur at any point in the n trials. Thus the use of combinations and not permutations. This assumes replacement or essentially resetting the situation such that the probability, p remains constant.

If we need to assume without replacement consider using the hypergeometric distribution, instead.

Parameters

The number of trials, n, is fixed and discrete, n ∈ { 0, 1, 2, …, n }

The probability of success, p, also known as the Bernoulli probability parameter is likewise fixed and ranges 0 ≤ p ≤ 1

The count of success, k is a random variable and is count data, k ∈ { 0, 1, 2, …, n }

Probability Density Function (PDF)

When t ≥ 0 then the probability density function formula is:

$$ \displaystyle\large f\left( k \right)=\left( \begin{array}{l}n\\k\end{array} \right){{p}^{k}}{{\left( 1-p \right)}^{n-k}}$$

A plot of the PDF provides a histogram-like view of the time-to-failure data.

Cumulative Density Function (CDF)

F(t) is the cumulative probability of failure given k successes. Very handy when estimating the proportion of units that will fail over a warranty period, for example. If each trial represented the warranty period duration of stresses.

$$ \displaystyle\large F\left( k \right)=\sum\limits_{j=0}^{k}{\frac{n!}{j!\left( n-j \right)!}{{p}^{j}}{{\left( 1-p \right)}^{n-j}}}$$

The binomial CDF is a tedious set of calculations and without the benefits of modern computing power has been estimated using Poisson or Normal distribution approximations.

If n ≥ 20 and p ≤ 0.005, or if n ≥ 100 and np ≤ 10, you may use the Poisson distribution with μ = np

$$ \displaystyle\large F\left( k \right)\cong {{e}^{-\mu }}\sum\limits_{j=0}^{k}{\frac{{{\mu }^{j}}}{j!}}$$

If np ≥ 10 and np(1-p) ≥ 10 than the normal distribution provides a suitable approximation

$$ \displaystyle\large F\left( k \right)\cong \Phi \left( \frac{k+0.5-np}{\sqrt{np\left( 1-p \right)}} \right)$$

Reliability Function

R(t) is the chance of k successes. Instead of looking for the proportion that will fail the reliability function determine the proportion that are expected to survive.

$$ \displaystyle\large \begin{array}{l}R\left( k \right)=1-\sum\limits_{j=0}^{k}{\frac{n!}{j!\left( n-j \right)!}{{p}^{j}}{{\left( 1-p \right)}^{n-j}}}\\R\left( k \right)=\sum\limits_{j=k+1}^{n}{\frac{n!}{j!\left( n-j \right)!}{{p}^{j}}{{\left( 1-p \right)}^{n-j}}}\end{array}$$

Hazard Rate

This is the instantaneous probability of success for a given number of successes, k.

$$ \displaystyle\large \begin{array}{l}h\left( k \right)={{\left[ 1+\frac{{{\left( 1+\theta  \right)}^{n}}-\sum\limits_{j=0}^{k}{\left( \begin{array}{l}n\\k\end{array} \right){{\theta }^{j}}}}{\left( \begin{array}{l}n\\k\end{array} \right){{\theta }^{k}}} \right]}^{-1}}\\\text{where}\\\theta =\frac{p}{1-p}\end{array}$$

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Probability and Statistics for Reliability Tagged With: Statistics distributions and functions

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Miami Kicked My Butt
Using pH meters »

Comments

  1. Mark Liao says

    July 3, 2023 at 6:56 PM

    Probably an example will be much helpful for a freshman (like me) to understand besides the formulas.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ][display_form id=266][/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy