Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / 1896 – Keep the Mill in Repair

by Karl Burnett Leave a Comment

1896 – Keep the Mill in Repair

1896 – Keep the Mill in Repair

R. James Abernathy was a writer who specialized in flour and grain mills in the late 1800s. In 1880, he authored Practical Hints on Mill Building. Early in this 350-page technical manual, he wrote that millwright skill was declining. He thought the reason was that the millwrights were assembling mills from pre-fabricated components, instead of having to manufacture parts by hand. The manual was published in the United States and England, and remained an authority for several decades. It remains a reference for assessing mills for their historic value, such as applications for national historic registers.

From 1878 to 1881, Abernathy was the editor of the new monthly journal Grain Cleaner in Moline, Illinois. By 1893, the journal was published weekly as the Modern Miller in Kansas City. Abernathy still contributed occasionally, but also wrote for the journal Milling. In April 1896, Milling published a short piece by Abernathy that is very satisfactory to modern maintenance and reliability practitioners with experience in manufacturing. 

Abernathy cited a well-known adventure story, the 1840 memoir Two Years Before the Mast by Richard Henry Dana. Dana, a Harvard graduate, served as a common seaman on a merchant vessel sailing around South America to California. This was before the California gold rush – California was still Spanish territory. Abernathy referred to Dana’s comment that the ship was in better condition after 2 years at sea. He extended the concept to operating flour mills:

[Dana] said that when their ship returned after a two years’ voyage it was altogether in better trim than when it left home. There is no reason why a mill should not be operated on this principle; there is no reason why a mill should not improve with time, if properly cared for. Weak parts may be renewed or strengthened, poor construction cared for, and all the mistakes incident to the building of a new mill eradicated.

Dana wrote about maintenance at sea in two places. The first is in a section where he explains the daily routine at sea:

When I first left port, and found that we were kept regularly employed for a week or two, I supposed that we were getting the vessel into sea trim and that it would soon be over, and we should have nothing to do but to sail the ship; but I found that it continued so for two years, and at the end of the two years there was as much to be done as ever. As has often been said, a ship is like a lady’s watch, always out of repair. (Two Years Before the Mast, p. 15) 

Dana related several pages of detail about constant improvements to the rigging. Later in the book, Dana described how a ship leaving port was generally in bad condition, and how much effort was put into returning to port in the best shape possible as matter of pride. 

It is a common notion with landsmen that a ship is in her finest condition when she leaves port to enter upon her voyage; and that she comes home, after a long absence,

“With over-weathered ribs and ragged sails;

Lean, rent and beggared by the strumpet wind.” 

But so far from that, unless a ship meets with some accident, or comes upon the coast in the dead of winter, when work cannot be done upon the rigging, she is in her finest order at the end of the voyage. 

No merchant vessel looks better than an Indiaman, or a Cape Horner, after a long voyage; and many captains and mates will stake their reputation for seamanship upon the appearance of their ship when she hauls into the dock. (Two Years Before the Mast, p. 334)

Some of the work was cosmetic, but Dana also described preservation of wood and iron, tightening rigging, and there were elements of a 5S event in which “everything useless [was] thrown overboard…”

Abernathy compared his own experience after visiting many mills: 

While it is true that the mill should improve with time, it is also true that they usually run down. The writer frequently visits a number of large mills which constantly improve. They run better, look better, and are better. He visits certain other mills which are constantly moving downward. The bill of expenses is larger in the latter than in the former. In the case of the mills which are on the decline they have a periodical “tear-up-and-repair” season. Broken, worn-out machinery is renewed; there is a general cleaning up and repairing of the various details of the mill. It is done in a lump and at great expense, and is all to be done over again, because of the habit of neglect which is an inseparable part of the care of that mill. Even if this work were not inordinately expensive, it does not accomplish the result; it does not make the mill a better running mill.

Abernathy contrasted two ideas: periodic restoration of degradation versus sustained improvement through defect eliminations. He called repeated repairs a “thoughtless proceeding” since the mill was likely to break in the same place yet again. 

Abernathy recommended constant attention and drilling to root causes. He gave several specific examples of common problems and their solutions. He identified the real problem as one of leadership, the “habit of neglect” caused by a “procrastinating habit of those in charge.”  

The great principle in caring for a mill is to study the cause of trouble, and remove it at the earliest moment. In a short time the amount of trouble is reduced to a minimum. The cause is always removed .

The result that Abernathy had observed in this industry from defect elimination: lower repair and overhaul expense, less waste, fewer upsets, improved product quality, lower capital costs, and improved maximum demonstrated capacity…all noted prior to 1896.

Abernath, R. James, “Keep the Mill in Repair” Milling, Volume 8, No. 5, April 1896, p. 259. D.H. Ranck Pub. Co., Chicago, Illinois

https://hdl.handle.net/2027/umn.31951d00033710r?urlappend=%3Bseq=285%3Bownerid=113530930-289

Abernathy’s history as editor of milling journals: 

Scott, Franklin William. Collections of the Illinois State Historical Library, Volume VI. Biographical Series, Vol. 1: Newspapers and Periodicals of Illinois, 1814-1879. The Lakeside Press, R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company, Chicago, 1910. p. 245

https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/51557614/untitled-bushnell-historical-society

Abernathy, R. James, Practical Hints on Mill Building, self published, printed by R. H. Moore, Moline, Illinois, 1880

https://www.forgottenbooks.com/en/download/PracticalHintsonMillBuilding_10294612.pdf

Dana, Richard Henry, Jr., 1815-1882. Two Years Before the Mast.: A Personal Narrative of Life At Sea. New York: A. L. Burt, 1840. https://hdl.handle.net/2027/uc1.31822011019460

Filed Under: Articles, History of Maintenance Management, on Maintenance Reliability

About Karl Burnett

As long as people have built things, they've been frustrated by failure. In some situations, organizations have tried to improve how they used resources to maintain the systems they built.

I am a practicing reliability engineer, Professional Engineer, and CMRP. Currently, I work in power plant services. Formerly, an engineering manager and maintenance manager in manufacturing, and nuclear submarine repair engineer. My first exposure to maintenance management was as a 19-year-old technician in the engine room of a guided missile cruiser.

« 6 Ways Social Media Writing Improves Technical Writing
High Pressure Gas Cylinders…Relief Valve Failure »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of Karl BurnettArticles by Karl Burnett
in the History of Maintenance Management article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy